... in response to INS, posted by Wayne1 on Sep 17, 2002Wayne
Men of good conscience can disagree on this one, so if you feel differently I won't say you're wrong. But I don't agree with your general position, if I understand it correctly. It sounds like you are saying that if the woman marries the man for residency and leaves he should accept his responsibility under the affidavit of support he signed. I don't agree with that.
The law creating the affidavit of support for fiancee visas is fundamentally flawed. Where did this country get the idea that we don't have the right to marry anyone we want on this planet and live with them here in our country of citizenship? By making this a potentially financially catastrophic decision they are restricting or removing that right. The first liberty is economic liberty.
The reason the law exists is because we men who want to marry a foreign woman are a very small and unpopular minority. So the lawyers in Washington just threw this burden on our backs. They knew it would win them political mileage with 90% of the country. "We're saving you tax dollars. These irresponsible men will pay for these women even if they leave."
If we take the attitude that once the woman marries the man she should be entitled to stay in this country it will have the effect of creating an even greater incentive for foreign women to abuse the immigration laws. Is that good? The message is: Find a man, go to the US, leave him, find an attorney, enjoy the good life.
If the marriage fails within 2 years why shouldn't the woman return home? She doesn't need immigration laws to protect her from physical abuse. There are local laws that do that. If she's not happy with the man she can go home. What's wrong with that? She will be no worse off than before she came here. In fact, in cases like my ex she is better off even if she returns. She has met dozens of men here who would gladly petition for another K1 and bring her right back.
If the woman doesn't want to stay with her husband she can go home. That's the correct solution. Saying a man should have to continue to support a woman who is probably in the bed of another man is not the correct solution.
Steve