Planet-Love.com Searchable Archives
July 02, 2025, 09:14:22 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: This board is a BROWSE and SEARCH only board. Please IGNORE the Registration - no registration necessary. No new posts allowed. It contains the archived posts from the Planet-Love.com website from approximately 2001 through 2005.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Thought provoking news item  (Read 2260 times)
Pordzhik
Guest
« on: September 06, 2002, 04:00:00 AM »

From the Kyiv Post  http://www.thepost.kiev.ua/main/11749/

It would be interesting to get the full story on this one, has anybody found more about this?

Logged
BarryM
Guest
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2002, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to Thought provoking news item , posted by Pordzhik on Sep 6, 2002

If the girl was to get any other visa besides a K-1, she could marry who she wanted and be allowed to stay in the country. The K-1 is the only visa that restricts the marriage of an immigrant to a specific individual. I met a guy at Jack's BBQ earlier this year and he had the same situation. His wife had to return to Ukraine and go through the I-130 immigration process. The K-1 is probably the most restrictive visa perhaps for a good reason.

-blm

Logged
Pordzhik
Guest
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2002, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to A no brainer actually..., posted by BarryM on Sep 6, 2002

So she only has to return to Ukraine and start the I-130?

It's interesting for me when you state;

"If the girl was to get any other visa besides a K-1, she could marry who she wanted and be allowed to stay in the country."

This is very far from the situation here in Britain. Do many foriegners marry US citizens while visiting on non K-1 visas? Does the marriage ALWAYS give them the right to stay in the US?

Logged
tfcrew
Guest
« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2002, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to Re: A no brainer actually..., posted by Pordzhik on Sep 6, 2002

In the first place...K-1 visas are NOT "granted US CITIZENSHIP" after 90 days. What a mess.
Karl
Logged
BarryM
Guest
« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2002, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to Re: A no brainer actually..., posted by Pordzhik on Sep 6, 2002

US law allows for a change of status to their non-K-1 visa when foriegner marries a US citizen in the USA. It usually requires an attorney to do the paperwork but it's not too complicated. A friend of mine married an RW from Vladivostok who was here on a medical visa. Immigration laws are pretty lax in the US. All an immigrant needs to do is find a way to come here legally and then there are many avenues to obtaining permanent residency. All they need to do is hire an attorney for the most part. The K-1 is the exception to this.

-blm

Logged
MarkInTx
Guest
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2002, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to Thought provoking news item , posted by Pordzhik on Sep 6, 2002

Interesting. WOnder what happened to the first guy, huh?

Although why she is being deported is not secret: She came over on a specific fiance Visa... it wasn't a license to marry any American for 90 days...

Seems to me that instead of complaining, they should have filed a K-3 right away...

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!