... in response to Re: Doubtful, at Your Stage ... Maybe, posted by Mike on Mar 4, 2002Mike,
I read another post from someone that states that NSC *always* sends cables. If true, that is radically different than it was last year. At that time, it was my Congressman's aide that phoned NSC and was explicitly told it would shave more than 3 weeks off the process if I filed an I-824. I promptly did so - and sure enough, within 2 or 3 days after I received notice of approval, the cabled petition arrived in Warsaw.
As for the provisional file, all that is needed *in Warsaw*, is a bonafide 'A' number - which is not provided until you receive an approved I-129. In my case, the lady at the NSC was kind enough to give me that over the telephone, in advance of my actually receiving the letter. I wrote an e-mail to Warsaw - and included the 'A' number and asked for the provisional file to be established - which they agreed to do. I later followed that with a fax of the actual letter, once received. Once again, the provisional file was a minor expedient - I would imagine it shaved a week or two off the overall process. The REAL benefit to the provisional file is it triggers the Embassy to send an official letter and accompanying forms to your fiance - Packet 3, IIRC. Depending on where she lives and the time of the postal system enroute, this can add up to more than a trivial amount of time.
So . . . to sum it up:
* I believe you are correct that the petition must be received BEFORE the Embassy will conduct the FBI name check. This, in turn, MUST be complete BEFORE the Embassy will schedule an interview. The FBI name check ended up being the 'long pole in the tent' in my specific case.
* A provisional file, if requested (and *if* that particular Embassy agrees to open provisional files), can be opened as soon as you have an Approved petition with accompanying 'A' number. It triggers the Embassy to initiate the flow of paperwork that is necessary to be completed by the date of the interview.
* As for the various Service Centers and their policies on cabling petitions - it *used* to be that VSC *always* cabled, but TSC and NSC required the I-824. I recall reading some time ago that CSC refuses to cable petitions. It may be now that NSC also always cables petitions. For me - the added cost of the I-824 was WELL WORTH the money spent.
The only 'constant' is that of constant change - and with fallout from 11 Sep and implementation of Bush's Family Act, I expect the changes will persist for a long while. It is always a good idea to call the SC and ask them for specifics.
And finally - if I were doing it over again, I had spent a long time with Olya and we were very certain about our future before ever processing the K-1 - I would have done the DCF (and possibly, K-3) route - and it would have been better for all concerned.
FWIW
- Dan