Planet-Love.com Searchable Archives

GoodWife / Planet-Love Archives => Threads started in 2003 => Topic started by: CaliAdvisor on August 21, 2003, 04:00:00 AM



Title: Rumsfeld's Visit
Post by: CaliAdvisor on August 21, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
Well Rumsfeld rapped up his visit yesterday with the President, Defense Minister and top generals of Colombia. I wonder if he finds it ironic that both sides in the war get their financial backing from the same country: the USA. The guerilla is financed by our citizens drug purchases and the army is financed by our tax payments. Meanwhile its the Colombians who die fighting.


Title: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit
Post by: jim c on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Rumsfeld's Visit, posted by CaliAdvisor on Aug 21, 2003

You must be hanging with colombians. All the people who smuggled or made money from the dope business always told me if we didn't buy it they wouldn't sell it. We are giving them a papaya and they have to take it.
    It is not your friends that are dying for colombia they are in school and their fathers( the ones who benefit from the trickle down dope money)pay so they don't have to fight. The fighting is done by poor indians, fighting poor indians, while the wealthy business and political class sit at parties and talk about how they love their country. You may notice that things started getting done after the bombing of the walnut club in Bogota. (only dumb indians are suposed to die) Farc is still denying they did it. BIG Mistake!!!
    As to the dope, a guy I know, who made a lot of money in New York, once told me, if they arrested everyone in Cali that was in the business, the whole town would be in jail. My question to you is , was colombia better off when Pablo ruled and the president took dope money. I bet your friends daddies think so. jim c


Title: Borja's quote
Post by: cancunhound on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Rumsfeld's Visit, posted by jim c on Aug 22, 2003

I like how Colombian congressman Wilson Borja summed up the situation in one short phrase - "Colombia is so poor because Colombia is so rich".  

A mere 1% of the population owns 60% of the land.  Drugs are just one small part of the mess down there.



Title: Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit
Post by: CaliAdvisor on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Rumsfeld's Visit, posted by jim c on Aug 22, 2003

Your missing the point. It is not a matter of "if we didnt buy it, they wouldnt sell it" there are ALWAYS going to be buyers. Since the dawn of civilization, man has been seeking to self medicate himself. It is a matter of "if it wasn't ilegal, we wouldn't make any money selling it".

You seem to have the impression that all Colombians are narco traficers. This is as wrong as wrong can be.  Most Colombians want this scourge to be rid of their country because it distorts every aspect of their country especially their economy. Look at Cali for example. In spite of its bad state of repair and lousy public services, it is one of the most expensive cities in Colombia while cities like Manizales and Medellin are modern and efficient. Why? Because all the money that was flying into this town 15 years ago boosted the cost of living for EVERYONE. The trickle down affects are no longer present, but the elevated cost of living sure is.



Title: Re: Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit
Post by: jim c on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit, posted by CaliAdvisor on Aug 22, 2003

Look Abby

  I spent 12 years in Narcotic Enforcement. I taught at the Detroit Police academy and was an instructor for the DEA local tech schools. I am aware of mans wish to alter his state of reality. So don't bother getting into the legalization crap. It didn't work in England and won't work here.  Look at Amsterdam which is now a big dope den and whorehouse. I remember it from 1971.

Read the archives. Twenty five years ago Bogota had dirt streets, I was there staying in the tequendama hotel. Cali was a colonial city with dirt roads. Most of the city was torn down and all those high rises were built to wash money. As to the trickle down effect who do you think lives in those expensive houses in Pance, El Ingenio and Cuidad Jardin How about all those high rises in Normandy and Arbolada. What!! you think the money came from sugar cane? Everyone was involved, Doctors, lawyers Politicians they all made money. People would buy houses for three times their value just to hide the money. We have a couple of malls in Miami where the sisters, cousins and aunties ran upscale stores with astronomical prices just to wash that money.

I bet you believe there were no Nazis in Germany. Do you expect the colombians to beg forgiveness? Most of them are only afraid of the violence of the business. I have dated four women from agencies who were married to traffickers and I am not talking about bag men. One lived in NYC and her husband was caught with 250 k's.  She asked me if that was a lot.  Another was married to a plastic surgeon who worked for Pablo. She told me he was killed in his car. I assumed it was an accident . Wrong!! It is very convienent to ignore where papi's money comes from. I think you had better keep your ears open wider than your mouth. Thinking you know something there can get you in real trouble. jim c



Title: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit
Post by: DOMINGUIN on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit, posted by jim c on Aug 22, 2003

Good points.  

I never asked any woman I met or dated what her ex husband did for a living. If they volunteered it,that was fine, but I wasn't going to get into the narco conversation unless it came up.  

Perhaps, some women I met might have been beneficiaries of the narco trade.  I remember going out just once in Bogota for lunch with a woman who had easily $10,000-$15,000 USD in jewelry and threads on her body, includng a Swiss gold watch, an emerald bracelet and earings with beautiful stones and designer clothes.  She was in Bariloche which is an exclusive resort area (I think in Argentina) last summer. Last summer, I did a 12 day car trip in a 93 Taurus with my 19 year son going to baseball games in New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore and visiting the Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, living in Motel 6's and gobbling down cheesburgers, fries and Cokes.  I decided not to give her full details of the trip!  And, here I was: "el norteamericano con dinero" with a $69.95 Timex I had bought specifically for the trip, so I wouldn't get ripped off.   Not that I could even afford her watch! And this woman was registered with an agency! Interestingly enough, at the sita she had been dressed nicely, but the jewelry was limited.

To try and educate myself about Colombia's politics, I read several books about Colombian history and politics (including Ingrid Betancourt's autobiography) before I left the US and realized that for me as an outsider to volunteer an informed opinion about a half century of non stop violence was just asking for trouble.

The subject came up a couple of times in Bogota and I would say as tactfully as I could that I had enough trouble following my own country's politics, that I had found the Colombians I met to be friendly and wonderful people and for so many people to die was such a terrible waste of life.  Another woman that I had dinner with in Bogota (unfortunately, a lawyer and the only woman I ever felt I was "competing" with for gender dominance) who spoke excellent English just wanted to discuss politics with me.  We disucssed American pop culture as a compromise, the  dinner never really became a date and I never saw her again.



Title: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit
Post by: CaliAdvisor on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit, posted by jim c on Aug 22, 2003

Shaking down crack peddlers on the mean streets of D-Town doesnt exactly make you Miami Vice material or an expert. I don't care how many single moms you sent to the slammer for long sentences in order to boost your arrest quota, the fantasies your spewing don't exactly add up.

Amsterdam? You want to talk about Amsterdam? That is one of the friendliest, most beautiful cities in Europe. Maybe in your ingnorance you didnt make it beyond the tourist red light districts, but thats your problem, next time invest in a better guide book or at least have the sense to venture beyond the disneyland tourist crap.

The people in this country hate the narcotraficers as much as you do. Look at what they did to Cali. It has been destroyed by them. In the 70s this was the most civic town in Colombia. The people lined up to get on the bus and the Valle Caucano work ethic was world renowned. The Paris of south america, then came the drug money and it all went to the crapper. These people want their city back and they want the "tracetos" (thats narcos cause you prolly dont even speak spanish) out.



Title: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit
Post by: jim c on August 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit, posted by CaliAdvisor on Aug 22, 2003

DEAR ABBY  When I was a Narc I worked with Heroin and Cocaine. They did not have crack then. The DEA Task Force worked class three violators that is ounce level and up, domestic. (an ounce buy of coke was $3,500.00) Miami Vice fed your brain with fantasys. It dosn't work that way.

Have you got a thing about sending single mothers to Jail? I don't see where that came from, unless it is a trauma event in your life. As to what was happening in the 70's, with your attitude and lack of culture, I doubt if you were even an intention at that time.  An adult with true experience would not find it necessary to stoop to sticks and stones to defend their opinion or even have a desire to. I haven't read any references to support your opinions, trick.

PS what did your mama look like. jim c



Title: CaliAdvisor in Search for Advice?
Post by: burbuja2 on August 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit, posted by CaliAdvisor on Aug 22, 2003

Great argument!  You belittle the excellent qualifications of jim c without bothering to enlighten us as to your own.  Do you think that sitting around dazed in a semi-circle with stoned-out friends while you contemplate a flower pot gives you any greater insight into the nefarious world of narcotics and dangerous drugs than a credentialed law enforcement official who has lived that world for 12 years?  I'm well aware that there are a mutitude of arguments concerning the economic and social effects created by narco-trafficing.  That can certainly be open to debate.  An idiotic attack, however, on the experience of an individual who is obviously well-qualified is hardly an effective way to advance your arguments.  Oh, and my advice?  The next time that addiction of yours raises its ugly head and you get a craving to post something really stupid-JUST SAY NO.


Title: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit
Post by: Traveller on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit, posted by CaliAdvisor on Aug 22, 2003

Dude, you just made yourself into an instant ass questioning Jim's credentials.
Miami Vice? If you knew anything about Jim, they probably did use Jim as the basis of some of the more professional characters on that show.
You have no idea who you are insulting. All things aside Jim has helped a heck of a lot of people out on this board and more people in person. You got a lot of nerve insulting him.


Title: Yep, this is Arron all right. diffrent name, but same character.n/t
Post by: mudd on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit, posted by CaliAdvisor on Aug 22, 2003

n/t


Title: I don't think so.....
Post by: Cali James on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Yep, this is Arron  all right. diffrent ..., posted by mudd on Aug 22, 2003


I don't think it's Aaron.....


Title: Cali Advisor
Post by: thundernco on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit, posted by CaliAdvisor on Aug 22, 2003

Advisor,

I've been following the thread, interesting points of view on all sides.  For my own edification, what exactly is your experience/education in regards to this topic? -TNC



Title: narcos in Cali
Post by: cancunhound on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Rumsfeld's Visit, posted by CaliAdvisor on Aug 22, 2003

I was always under the impression that Cali's infrastructure is a direct result of the drug trade.  I consider Cali to be very modern and well laid out by LA standards - the drug trade hasn't destroyed Cali, it's built Cali IMHO.  Many consider the Cali Cartel to be the most sucessfull criminal organization ever in the world - it shows in Cali.  I haven't noticed any overwhelming hatred for the narcos there either - I quit asking friends questions like "what does that guy do?  He's constantly running errands all day in that nice suv, but appears to have no job?" - the answer is just kind of a hush-hush wink.  The drug trade is still big-time in Cali.


Title: Re: narcos in Cali
Post by: CaliAdvisor on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to narcos in Cali, posted by cancunhound on Aug 22, 2003

The Cali Cartel doesn't exist anymore. The main cartels now adays are the "North Valle" cartel which is based in Northern Valle de Cauca (ie. Cartago, Tulua, Buga) and the Coastal Cartel which is up arround Baranquilla and Santa Marta. Its all been very scattered out and now is in the hands of a lot of smaller time players. The guerilla are playing a bigger role than ever.


Title: Re: Re: narcos in Cali
Post by: thundernco on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: narcos in Cali, posted by CaliAdvisor on Aug 22, 2003

Advisor, y

You're on point, the North Valley & Coastal Cartels as well as other small players have picked up significant market share. However, the Cali Cartel is still around, not dead, although in a very dimished and injured capacity.  

http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/js122.htm

-TNC



Title: Re: Re: narcos in Cali
Post by: CaliAdvisor on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: narcos in Cali, posted by CaliAdvisor on Aug 22, 2003

Don't mean to contradict you though Cancunhound. Obviously there are still a lot of tracetos working in Cali.


Title: Re: Re: Re: narcos in Cali
Post by: JSlo on August 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: narcos in Cali, posted by CaliAdvisor on Aug 22, 2003

Normally I stay on the sidelines and let the mud slinging take its course. However, this time you've stumbled upon a nerve of mine. You dare to question someone with experience in the fight against drugs because you READ a BOOK! Best laugh I've had this week. You my friend (to quote a famous personality)are de ja vu, ALL OVER AGAIN! Those spots and stripes are beginning to reappear. Repeat quickly after me: eye sofa king we todd did. Welcome Back.  
JSlo


Title: What to do
Post by: Pete E on August 21, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Rumsfeld's Visit, posted by CaliAdvisor on Aug 21, 2003

Yes you are right,we are contributing to both sides ,one by official policy and the other by illicit trade we have not been able to control.Does that make it a wash or mean we should do nothing? I don't think so.
Colombia needs our help.We are giving it to an extent.They are our number 3 reciever of forign aid.They finaly seem to have developed the will to do something about the rebels.Long ovedue in my opinion in a country where 30,000 or so rebels are really screwing up thier way of life and economic prospects.
I think you will see more US involvement here.If we had not been distracted by worse situations in the middle east we would be doing more right now I think.Colombia is an important country to the US and very important to alot of us here individually.

Pete



Title: Message board FAQ's
Post by: cancunhound on August 21, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Rumsfeld's Visit, posted by CaliAdvisor on Aug 21, 2003

"These message boards are intended as an area in which people can post questions and stories about international dating"

Politics is a little off subject unless you're dating one of these guys.  This board has enough useless info on it as it is  - no need to further contibute to it.



Title: Yes - - but
Post by: Pete E on August 21, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Message board FAQ's, posted by cancunhound on Aug 21, 2003

Since Colombia is the main country of interest here and we have lots of guys married to and engaged to Colombianas and guys living in Colombia and thinking of doing so political and economic conditions within Colombia are relevent if not the main focus of discusion.Colombia is in a bad way that they may have a chance of working their way out of.Those of us intimately involved with Colombia and Colombianas are quite interested in the outcome.Things could get quite volitile and we would be affected.I personally think it is the number one country of concern of to the United States in the western hemisphere.They are the country we give the third most foriegn aid to.
That being said hopefully this will not digress in to political arguments because that would be disruptive to the main intent of the board.It should be mostly imformational.

Pete



Title: Re: Message board FAQ's
Post by: Traveller on August 21, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Message board FAQ's, posted by cancunhound on Aug 21, 2003

No, I disagree with that. The more information about this place the better. Heck, I forgot SecDef was down here.
Remember, Colombia isn't only about finding a woman, it's a complicated country and the more you know, the better off you might be.
I throw unrelated stuff on here now and again and it's basically accepted because I am here 24/7. But, I don't know nearly everything. It's good someone else posts information about Colombia even though it's not strictly about finding the girl of your dreams.
You have all heard Cali es Cali. Well, on the same token, Colombia is Colombia.
Speaking of Cali es Cali, CaliesCali.Com is featuring Xiomara, my receptionist, this week. She is San Andres taking photos for CaliBuenaNota.Com.


Title: Re: Re: Message board FAQ's
Post by: zack on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Message board FAQ's, posted by Traveller on Aug 21, 2003

What is caliescali.com anyway? Since the website is in Spanish, I couldn't tell exactly what it's purpose is.

xiomara is stunning. Must be rough having a receptionist
like that.

Zack



Title: Re: Re: Re: Message board FAQ's
Post by: Michael B on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: Message board FAQ's, posted by zack on Aug 22, 2003

It's sponsored by the local newspapers and/or chamber of commerce. It's similar to 'What's happening in Louisville this week'. It has a bikini girls section, a social page, legitimate news, a 'friends looking for friends' (where I met my fiancee) section, night club and resturant review section  and a few other sections. Do you have access to a "Louisville Now" of "Frankfort Today" site? That's what it is, except in Spanish. BTW, when I was a little kid, I did first grade at Nickolasville, KY, how close are you to that place?


Title: Re: Re: Re: Re: Message board FAQ's
Post by: zack on August 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: Re: Message board FAQ's, posted by Michael B on Aug 22, 2003

I live in Bowling Green, Kentucky, which is about a two to three hour drive to Nickolasville. I grew up in the Chicago
area.

Zack



Title: That's your receptionist?
Post by: Michael B on August 21, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Message board FAQ's, posted by Traveller on Aug 21, 2003

Then you probably don't mind going to work. Say, what does your filing clerk look like? I always tell guys to look at Caliescali.com (I think I was the first one here to find it and I told everybody else). I met my fiancee in the busca amigos section of Caliescali


Title: Re: Michael
Post by: roadken on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to That's your receptionist?, posted by Michael B on Aug 21, 2003

Michael,how do you find the section with the available women at Caliescali?My spanish is poor is it's all "greek" to me.


Title: Re: Re: Michael
Post by: Michael B on August 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Michael, posted by roadken on Aug 22, 2003

Well, I don't think it would do you any good if you can't read Spanish, it is not a commercial 'address seller' or 'take a tour' site, EVERYTHING is in Spanish, even (especialy) the ladies' profiles---they're not thinking 'the agency will translate this into English for me', they're thinking that only local people are going to be looking there (not that they aren't happy to get an email from a gringo, they just aren't expecting it). Now for the guys who can read and write Spanish, there are some excellent ladies on it and the response rate is pretty good. Many will even contact you first after seeing your profile. If you want to take a stab at it, click 'Registrate' on the opening page, and after you have registered, click 'busca amigos' and a screen where you select the stuff you are looking for (like age, where they live, etc) will come up.


Title: Xiomara
Post by: cancunhound on August 21, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Message board FAQ's, posted by Traveller on Aug 21, 2003

Actually I don't mind it either but political discussions are going to get nasty - but hey if Patrick's intent was to include it I'm on board.  We have another non-commercial group over a yahoo (ColombiaExperts) where we tear into that stuff.  Most of your posts tend to tie into the dating scene in one way or the other BTW.  But if you'd like more news - the Colombian govt. is now claiming they will have regained full control of the republic by November (hell judging what Uribe's done so far who knows?).

Traveller, curious about Xiomara (yes hard not to notice her this week), did they pay her for that CaliesCali gig - or was it kind of an honor thing that any model would jump on to gain exposure?  Just curious how much they get paid if anything at all on that site.  Now this question is related to women so it is clearly "in topic"!



Title: Full control in Colombia
Post by: DallasSteve2 on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Xiomara, posted by cancunhound on Aug 21, 2003

cancunhound wrote:

"the Colombian govt. is now claiming they will have regained full control of the republic by November"

I'd like to believe that, but I doubt it.

Here's what I've read:

1 - Kidnapping and guerilla attacks are down this year.  Some rebels are defecting (a few hundred).  That's all good news.

2 - Some say the rebels are retreating to the jungle instead fighting hardliner Uribe.  Under Colombian law he can only serve one 4-year term.  They figure they can wait 4 years and then start up the same old cycle.  They've got the cash to wait it out.  The Colombian army can't make any real dent in the rebels if they are holed up in the mountains/jungles.

3 - The rebels were estimated to have about 16,000 members in their army.  It's been growing by 1,000 or so per year recently.  So what if they loose a few hundred soldiers.  They will still be the same frightening force they were before.

4 - The FARC have been fighting the Colombian government for almost 40 years now.  I wish the Colombian army could defeat them, but as long as the US maintains its drug war against cocaine the FARC will continue to earn billions from the US drug market.  The only way to dry up the FARC is to cut off their income which means legalizing drugs.  Our country won't do that so the cycle will continue.

I've wondered if the government could solve the problem by cutting a secret deal with the leaders of the FARC.  Offer them each a few million dollars and passage out of the country.  It would be cheaper than what they're spending on the war.  But it probably wouldn't work because those guys are living like kings on the drug money, plus they've got hot and cold running beautiful, young Colombian women.  Sounds like a program to me.

Steve



Title: Re: Full control in Colombia
Post by: Traveller on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Full control in Colombia, posted by DallasSteve2 on Aug 22, 2003

The below statements are the type that turn these types of threads into nonsense and the reason why politics in any country can't be discussed on this board. Why? Because these statements draw ludicrious conclusions and are making uninformed generalizations. And, the soultion proposed by these statements are to simply pay and reward the "leaders of the FARC" by giving them safe passage out of the country when they have murdered tens of thousand of Colombians over the year.
I don't know about you, but I have a little more respect for the Colombian people who have lived with these knuckleheads for over 40 years and haven't given into them yet. To just pay the knuckleheads off and simply let them go is just a slap in their face and an insult to all the people who have died here by the farc.
I might sound a little fanatical about this, but I have been in Colombia in some form or fashion since '89 and I know some people that have been killed by the farc over the years. When I read stuff like the below statements, I think that the person who wrote it just wants his Colombian wife and get the heck away from the country and to heck with the country. A piece of advice, if you marry a Colombiana, you aren't going to seperate the two.
Just my early morning rant.

"The only way to dry up the FARC is to cut off their income which means legalizing drugs. Our country won't do that so the cycle will continue"
"I've wondered if the government could solve the problem by cutting a secret deal with the leaders of the FARC. Offer them each a few million dollars and passage out of the country. It would be cheaper than what they're spending on the war. But it probably wouldn't work because those guys are living like kings on the drug money, plus they've got hot and cold running beautiful, young Colombian women. Sounds like a program to me."



Title: Re: Re: Full control in Colombia
Post by: DallasSteve2 on August 22, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Full control in Colombia, posted by Traveller on Aug 22, 2003

Traveller

Why is my proposal "to heck with the country"?  I'm proposing a way to end the violence and to restore normalcy to Colombia.  That doesn't sound like "to heck with the country" to me.  Maybe it wouldn't work; I said in my earlier post that maybe it wouldn't work.  But, if you keep the present system (drug war) I promise you in 4 years the FARC will still be tormenting Colombia.

My proposal isn't saying "Reward the criminals".  Sorry, if you view it that way.  My proposal is saying "Better to pay for peace than to keep fighting an endless war".  It would save lives and money if it would work.  If Colombia has peace they can begin to rebuild their economy and provide a better life for their people.

You can disagree with my idea, but please don't accuse me of not caring about the well-being of Colombia.  You're wrong about that.

Steve



Title: Re: Xiomara
Post by: Traveller on August 21, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Xiomara, posted by cancunhound on Aug 21, 2003

No, CaliesCali doesn't pay the girls. You would think they would. Pretty much, I'm the only guy in town that pays the girls for their photos.
Heck, even the clubs when they have a runway show don't even pay the girls most of the time. Whenever they do runway shows they charge a cover at the door. The make an extra 2 to 3 million a night because of the show, you'd think they'd kick down 40 or 50 thousand pesos to the girls but they don't. Cheapskates.


Title: that sucks (n/t)
Post by: cancunhound on August 21, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Xiomara, posted by Traveller on Aug 21, 2003



Title: Re: Message board FAQ's
Post by: CaliAdvisor on August 21, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Message board FAQ's, posted by cancunhound on Aug 21, 2003

Ahh... Good point.. It is ironic though. And we should all make sure we have some respect and compasion for these Colombians because our country is a big reason why theirs is in the dumps. Nuff said.