Planet-Love.com Searchable Archives

GoodWife / Planet-Love Archives => Threads started in 2003 => Topic started by: Febtember on April 17, 2003, 04:00:00 AM



Title: help
Post by: Febtember on April 17, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
Any single  never been married men here who's interested in writing my very good friend and nieghbor in philippines please e-mail me with this address kieh2002@nospam.com so I can send you her address.She is 36 yrs. old,daycare teacher,devoted catholic and have very good personality,she's pretty too.She is a gem.She's looking for guy much older than her.
Raquel


Title: Help
Post by: Dingo on April 17, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to help, posted by Febtember on Apr 17, 2003

Hi, I have a good friend who is looking for a wife.
He is 48 years old and single with no kids. He has been a devote Catholic for his entire life.
His name is Ricky, he owns his own Dentistry in Ohio.
He has been married before but he divorced his ex-wife of 2 years as
she cheated on him and stole money from his business.
They divorced over 12 years ago.
Ricky does not smoke and NEVER drinks. He loves to travel and is very
kind and understanding person.

His only problem is that he thinks George Bush is a super President
when in reality he is just a war monger with a silver spoon in his mouth trying to get out of his dad's shadow and trying to hide from the
economic problems in our own country. He and his administration
have yet to find weapons of mass destruction of the quanities he accused
Saddam of having, where are the weapons? Where is Bin Laden, Where is
Saddam?

Iraq Museum of History was looted. Many items from the cratel
of civilazation were stolen, where did Bush have his troops?
Protecting the Iraqi Ministry of Oil.  While the Museums, schools,
and Hospitals were being looted.  Now today it comes out on CNN
that Bush and his cohorts allowed Iraq's Central Public Health Laboratory to be looted
as our troops stood by outside and did nothing as ordered.
Well this facility contained vials and live samples of many Deadly Illnesses
used for research including, HIV, and Polio, now these vials have just
disappeared.  Who knows where they will end up? Kansas City, Portland? N.Y?

Saddam was evil he had to go but so should Kim Jung Ill and many others.
What about the brutality and murders made by the Burmese regime in Asia?
Why is the U.S. not there?  Well I'll tell you why.
Korea and Burma have no "Oil of Ministry"

Hospitals, Schools and Museums get looted.
International Hotels in Bagdad get blown apart with Journalist
from around the world getting injured in the attack.
Bush "says" he is concerned about Terrorism but he lets the
Health Laboratory get looted.

Sorry I digress Raquel, I should have put all that other stuff in
a different message.

Please let me know if your friend might like to meet Ricky.
He want to go to the Philippines next month.

Thanks



Title: Re: Help
Post by: stefang on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Help, posted by Dingo on Apr 17, 2003

I think both parties are just crooks working for special interests that is why America is being sold away. It started about 20 years ago. I am the old fashioned American and believe in isolationism. It is not are business to police the world, to many empires in the past tried and the only thing they got out of it was the destruction of their own country. Sorry to say America is going down hill fast, another empire bites the dust our currency is way overvalued with the debt load that we have but the Euros and Japs try to keep it up by buying it, otherwise it could lead to a global meltdown. America is still the greatest because of our freedoms but I think to many people have abused these rights. We have too much drugs, greed, profanity, crime, etc.. schools falling apart with poor education, roads, bridges crumbling but we can give billions in tax dollars to multinational firms. Truthfully I believe as I said above the special interests and past Pres. have been milking Americans and leaving national debts for the next generations to take care of. I don't like the idea of having children and then saying here you go take care of the party I had back in the 90's.

Funny is hearing people that don't have children complain about paying taxes for schools? Some day those children will take care of these people when they have no one, because of their selfishness. I think the average national debt per person now is 24K. So a family of four would owe 100K. I cringe when I hear Bush say he wants to give 30 billion to help oil companies making billions in profits. It must be nice being able to print your own money and spend more than you make year in year out but someday it has to stop. Another rant is the destruction of homes through divorce. This is why we are all here I guess. I wanted a foreign wife hoping to find a woman that still holds morals, something most Americans don't anymore. If I ran for president my slogan would be " Ask not what a purple G-string can do for but what you can do for a purple G-string.



Title: Re: Re: Help
Post by: Dave H on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Help, posted by stefang on Apr 18, 2003

Hi Stefang,

I agree with much of what you say. I certainly won't quarrel with you over the fact that wealthy special interest groups control both major political parties. It is not 'We The People' as it should be. Isolationism may make a comeback among American popular opinion (I don't think politicians or big business will favor it). I think most Americans are tired of repeatedly being crapped on by the very countries we have continually saved from occupation and oppression and bailed out financially over the years. I am not in favor of closing the borders and keeping the world out. But, I hope we remember who our friends and allies really are and give them preferential treatment! I am now awaiting large anti-American protests to break out in Iraq. After 25 years of pent-up anger, we have now freed them to release this energy to complain and protest...Saddam is gone, who else are they going to focus on? I am against giving total control of the country back to the Iraqis until they can prove that they can run the country as a democracy, without the use of violence and terror. It may take years, but I am not afraid of being called an imperialist.

I love your campaign slogan. You have my vote! ;o)))

Dave H.



Title: Re: Re: Re: Help
Post by: stefang on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: Help, posted by Dave H on Apr 19, 2003

Dave you know the purple G is the key to unite the people. Now you have the left cheek party and the right cheek party. The parties are split by a crack in philosophies. This is were the Purple G could unite the parties by providing the bridge to bring them together but it would not cover their objectives. The purple G allows the party cheeks total freedom to show what they can accomplish together. Of course the president would have a bullet proof kevlar Purple G.


Title: I Wish...
Post by: Dave H on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Help, posted by Dingo on Apr 17, 2003

...Bush was a warmonger!

Hey Dingo,

The main thing about George W. Bush that bothers me sometimes is that he cares too much about what The United Nations, Third World tyrants, and dumbass French, Russians (some Germans), and even what a few leftest and liberal Americans think! They hate us and our way of government and life anyway! War is War...kill the bastards and take their friggin' oil! Why? Because we can! I also agree that we should go after the others! Let's march through France and take their friggin' wine (WHINE) and cheese! They won't stop us! Then into Germany and Russia and aaaa...leave the women for the Russian Board. Next work our way across China and into North Korea! Bush is no warmonger...I am!!! :o)))

The "deadly illnesses" at Iraq's Central Public Health Laboratory were bound for the US anyway. I have a few choice cities in mind where I would prefer them to end up. We have vaccines, treatments, and preventative measures for most of the illnesses.

Don't sweat the Iraq Museum of History "treasures" too much! The word has it that Saddam carted off the real stuff years ago and replaced it with replicas. You should have seen what was destroyed and stolen during W.W.II!

I'm with you on the stupid journalists in the middle of the battle in Baghdad getting blown apart in their hotels...that was cool! I just wish they had better film footage.

Dave H.



Title: Re: I Wish...
Post by: Dingo on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to I Wish..., posted by Dave H on Apr 18, 2003

Hmmm. wonder what Saddam would look like in a purple G-String.
Cheers


Title: Re: Re: I Wish...
Post by: Dave H on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: I Wish..., posted by Dingo on Apr 18, 2003

Hi Dingo,

Probably pretty sexy! He has a much nicer tan than me. ;o)))  

Dave H.



Title: Don't forget Berkeley!
Post by: Ray on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to I Wish..., posted by Dave H on Apr 18, 2003

Great thoughts Dave! TNTPIMMFP!

Don't forget to save a bomb for the faggot commies in Berkeley and San Francisco too!

Ray




Title: Berkeley Is not A
Post by: greg on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Don't forget Berkeley!, posted by Ray on Apr 18, 2003

Faggot town. I don't know where you got your False information from about my City.


Title: Thanls! I Won't...
Post by: Dave H on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Don't forget Berkeley!, posted by Ray on Apr 18, 2003

Hi Ray,

I guess I can't scare them with the HIV virus. Maybe I should ban the wearing of Birkenstocks. I can close all of the Borders and Barnes & Noble Book stores, along with Starbucks! I am sorry for those innocents who will be effected by this. They will just have to buy their morning coffee at 7-11 and Dunkin' Donuts like the rest of us. ;o))) Damn, I think this power is getting to my head! I will make meat puppets out of anyone who disagrees with me. I wonder if Udai can come out of his bunker and play with me and my toys? %-)

Dave H.



Title: You have aptly Stated
Post by: outwest77 on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Help, posted by Dingo on Apr 17, 2003

[This message has been edited by outwest77]

And so eloquently stated, .......the FRENCH POSITION on the war,,,,,,,,,,

LOL, enough on our igrate french "allies"


God Bless America, our troops, and hope we can gracefully quickly find a way to leave iraq, seems its turning into somewhat of a mess. I predicted about 2 weeks ago that the Shiites, the Sunis The Kurds, etc etc would quickly start bickering between themselves,


Our intentions were good, i support the war.

The question is,,,,,,now what



Title: My Solution....
Post by: Dave H on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to You have aptly Stated, posted by outwest77 on Apr 18, 2003

[This message has been edited by Dave H]

Hi Outwest,

Any Muslims in Iraq that don't get along with each other and America...I will grill their stomachs on my barbecue! ;o))) Starting with Saddam and the Minister of Information. Grilled stomachs and French fries...Yum Yum!

Dave H.



Title: Re: My Solution....
Post by: outwest77 on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to My Solution...., posted by Dave H on Apr 18, 2003

Dave i heard the information minister is no longer around
shame, i really like that guy he was hilarious


Title: Me Too!
Post by: Dave H on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: My Solution...., posted by outwest77 on Apr 19, 2003

Hi Outwest,

I really liked the Information Minister Muhammed Saeed al-Sahaf! He was a laugh a minute! ROFLMAOCUML!!! (Coughing Up My Lungs) I remember when a Fox News anchor first dismissed him as nothing more than a "low-level cabinet member." LOL That guy should have his own TV show in America. ;o))) It is no wonder Saddam chose him:

"Lying is forbidden in Iraq. President Saddam Hussein will tolerate nothing but truthfulness as he is a man of great honor and integrity. Everyone is encouraged to speak freely of the truths evidenced in their eyes and hearts."  

"I triple guarantee you, there are no American soldiers in Baghdad."

"They're not even [within] 100 miles [of Baghdad]. They are not in any place. They hold no place in Iraq. This is an illusion ... they are trying to sell to the others an illusion."

"They are not in Baghdad.  They are not in control of any airport. I tell you this. It is all a lie. They lie. It is a hollywood movie.  You do not believe them."

"Listen, this explosion does not frighten us any langer. The cruise missiles do not frighten anyone. We are catching them like fish in a river. I mean here that over the past two days we managed to shoot down 196 missiles before they hit their target."

"They are sick in their minds. They say they brought 65 tanks into center of city. I say to you this talk is not true. This is part of their sick mind."

Go to this website to keep the laughs coming.

http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com/


Dave H.



Title: Baghdad Bob is dead
Post by: Ray on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Me Too!, posted by Dave H on Apr 19, 2003

Unless that was just a rumor, I heard he committed suicide. It must have been that Saturday Night Live episode that pushed poor Bob over the top. I sure miss Baghdad Bob's news conferences! He could lie almost as well as Clinton... CUMFL!

Ray



Title: Oh...Say It Aint So!
Post by: Dave H on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Baghdad Bob is dead, posted by Ray on Apr 19, 2003

[This message has been edited by Dave H]

Hi Ray,

I just spoke with Baghdad Bob by satelite phone a few minutes ago and rest easy that he is fine! This is the text of our conversation:

DH - I heard you were dead.

BB - "Desperate Americans"

DH - Is it true?

BB - "They are becoming hysterical. This is the result of frustration. Let the American infidels bask in their illusion! Blood-sucking bastards"

DH - But this information came from a reliable source.

BB - "These cowards have no morals. They have no shame about lying. They do not even have control over themselves! Do not believe them!"

DH - We recieved information that you had committed suicide from al-Jazeera.

BB - "Just look carefully, I only want you to look carefully. Do not repeat the lies of liars. Do not become like them. Once again, I blame al-Jazeera before it ascertains what takes place. Please, make sure of what you say and do not play such a role."

DH - Well it sure does sound like your voice Baghdad Bob.

BB - "I can say, and I am responsible for what I am saying, that they have started to commit suicide under the walls of Baghdad."

DH - So you are saying that it is the coalition forces that have committed suicide?

BB - "Be assured. Our initial assessment is that they will all die"

DH - Then, what is your take on these false rumors of your untimely demise?

BB - "I blame Al-Jazeera - they are marketing for the Americans! Do not in fact repeat their lies."

DH -  Thanks Baghdad Bob! I was really worried about your safety! Are you scared?

BB - "No I am not scared, and neither should you be!"

DH -  Goodbye Baghdad Bob.

BB - "Don't believe anything! I triple guarantee you everything is okay."

DH - Thanks!

Say...you don't suppose that was prerecorded? ;o)))

Dave H.



Title: He's Alive!
Post by: Ray on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Oh...Say It Aint So!, posted by Dave H on Apr 19, 2003

[This message has been edited by Ray]

ROTFFLMGDAOTAHAIPCNTPIMGDPBITIJSAOMPANIRDIMS!

Sounded genuine to me! Did you by any chance get a trace on that sattelite phone? We better get Bob out of there before Walker and Calamity Jane get him in their sights! :-)

Ray



Title: Re: You have aptly Stated
Post by: Dingo on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to You have aptly Stated, posted by outwest77 on Apr 18, 2003

Outwest said:

"And so eloquently stated, .......the FRENCH POSITION on the war,,,,,,,,,,
You and The Dixie chicks, and Susan Sarandon, and Tim Robbins, and Martin sheen and Sean Penn, and all the peace mongers, maybe you can form your own country, where
every one just gets along, sips tea, eats bon bons, and all the other countrys will just play nice"

Dingo said:

Outwest, Democrats are French?
50% of American's are French?
French Position? I prefer this one
*** Warning Not for the Faint of Heart ***
http://users.forthnet.gr/ath/nektar/kma/contents45.htm

Hum Don't try this at home....unless Sallie will let you ;0)

I don't like Tim Robbins he's to tall and scary looking.
Sean Penn Peace Monger? Well if you ever ran into that
guy in a dark eye I don't think you'd get much Peace
just a punch in the eye from that quack.

You say go live in a country where everyone gets along
and eats bon bons? Why is that such a bad thing?
Cheers!!

Dingo



Title: Re: Re: You have aptly Stated
Post by: outwest77 on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: You have aptly Stated, posted by Dingo on Apr 18, 2003

Dingo even though you are a democrat , u seem cool, LOL


Title: Re: Re: Re: You have aptly Stated
Post by: Dingo on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: You have aptly Stated, posted by outwest77 on Apr 19, 2003

Maraming Salamat.
And thanks for the info on the typhoon.
I've got family there now.
From the pic of the Map that thing looks Huge!!!


Title: Is that how you...
Post by: Humabdos on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: You have aptly Stated, posted by Dingo on Apr 18, 2003

get F-ed in the lobot Dingo?  ROTFLMFAO!
Hum


Title: Re: Is that how you...
Post by: Dingo on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Is that how you..., posted by Humabdos on Apr 18, 2003

Well Hum I did see Doggy Style on that site but
not Dingo Style I'll have to make something up.

Maybe a Pinch, slap and a tickle. LOL



Title: Grrrrreat Post on Bush &
Post by: greg on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Help, posted by Dingo on Apr 17, 2003

his true intentions. Oil, nothing but Oil was his Motive. Bush is throwing away our hard earned Tax dollars on other countries for Favors, while doing nothing for us American citizens..What has he done for Americans??? Our children are getting killed, our money is being wasted..Yeah, Bingo..Your right, Bush is nothing but a War Monger serving the Rich. No matter, I support our Troops. Sergeant Master Gunner says Goooooo USA Troops..Goooooooooooooooooooooooooo


Title: I Hope So!
Post by: Dave H on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Grrrrreat Post on Bush &, posted by greg on Apr 18, 2003

[This message has been edited by Dave H]

Hi Greg,

Oil sounds like a very good reason to me. Thats what the French wanted. Now we have to figure out how we are going to keep it, after we already agreed to give the profits to the Iraqi people. I'm still waiting for the US Imperialist George W. Bush to build an oil pipeline through the mountains of Afghanistan to my front door. :o))) ROFLMAOPIMMFP!!!

Dave H.



Title: dingo....
Post by: Peaches on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Help, posted by Dingo on Apr 17, 2003

Watch Mr. Personality at Fox channel you will like it. She's hosting
the reality tv show ...damn it! ( excuse my language).



Title: Isn't it refreshing...
Post by: Ray on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Help, posted by Dingo on Apr 17, 2003

...after 8 years of that butt-licking, French-sucking, coward-ass Clinton to finally have a president with integrity, balls, and an uncanny ability to make Democrats cry and weep like little lost children? I LOVE IT!

ROTFFLMGDAOCUMFLTNTPIMFP!

Ray



Title: Saddam's Fatal Mistake...
Post by: Dave H on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Isn't it refreshing..., posted by Ray on Apr 18, 2003

Hi Ray,

...he thought all Americans were like Bill Clingon and his loyal followers. A few missles fired in the desert, then negotiation.

Hey, maybe Saddam is hiding up Chirac's butt! Anyone seen Cuban cigar smoke coming out of Chirac's butt? Maybe he is thirsty. The French should use party boy Bill Clingon's fat, ugly head for a champagne cork! Then shove the whole friggin' bottle up Chirac's gay ass! Maybe Teddy Kennedy will come along for a drink...or two..or three... PIMMFGDP!!!


Dave H.



Title: Re: Saddam's Fatal Mistake...
Post by: outwest77 on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Saddam's Fatal Mistake..., posted by Dave H on Apr 18, 2003

you share my views of the French, you are a good guy, Dave


Title: Help
Post by: Stephen on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Help, posted by Dingo on Apr 17, 2003

So....you're friend Ricky is a hell of a lot smarter than you are.

But so are mosty people.

Stephen



Title: Re: Help
Post by: Nathan on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Help, posted by Dingo on Apr 17, 2003


  The lady was posting a sincere request, and I doubt she was looking for an idiotic tirade. There are plenty of
political forums to use if that is your interest, but you will find that your kind of post will not get a very good response here. Your post sounds like a booze induced rant.


Title: Re: Re: Help
Post by: Dingo on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Help, posted by Nathan on Apr 18, 2003

I'll rant if I wanna Damit ( In drunken voice with slured speach )
Plenty of other "political post made on this board" Just
because you don't like what I have to say.
I served in the US Army..where's my mouse ?
Now pass me another Serbesa.....damnit...(HiC-uP)


Title: Re: Re: Re: Help
Post by: Nathan on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: Help, posted by Dingo on Apr 18, 2003


  I don't think it's the booze or the politics as such, but it is a pretty weird response to the Lady's post that had nothing to do with politics. However, if you wanted to get flamed like crazy, you came to the right place.
Not many Clinton Democrats post here I think...I'm only guessing that they prefer trashy big haired women.
But if you keep up your good sense of humor, you will likely survive even here.



Title: Take your ...
Post by: Humabdos on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Help, posted by Dingo on Apr 17, 2003

Anti War crap where someone gives a rats ass!

Hum



Title: Leaving it here will be fine
Post by: lswote on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Take your ..., posted by Humabdos on Apr 18, 2003

I give a rats ass.  I support the troops now that they are in Iraq but think Bush was wrong for sending them and did it for self-serving reasons, not because it was in our country's best interest.


Title: Re: Leaving it here will be fine
Post by: Peter Lee on April 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Leaving it here will be fine, posted by lswote on Apr 18, 2003

We came for oil

Oil is power

Power to buy technology

Power to buy support in exchange for oil

Power in the wrong hands is dangerous for us and unpredictable.  

I don't want any more surprises like 9-11 again and the power of oil in the wrong hands is a future nightmare of surprises.  .

We should never excuse that we came to control the oil, without the oil Iraq would be a bunch of camel jockies playing in the sand.

Self-serving reasons yes, was to take the oil power away from irresponsible dictators.   I also know that as long as Bush is in the White House I will never have to sell my Bronco with the 9 mpg.

I hope we keep control of the oil and get bases in Iraq for as long as we want.   I figure it would take about 10 years for Iraq to become a democracy.  

I hope we get our own Arab TV station to air our propaganda so at least they see both sides

I hope McDonalds and K- Mart rule Iraq as soon as possible

May every Iraqi drink Pepsi and a diet Coke?

There is only one Power America  and his messenger is Pres. Bush Peace be unto him



Title: Confused?
Post by: Dave H on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Leaving it here will be fine, posted by lswote on Apr 18, 2003

[This message has been edited by Dave H]

Hi lswote,

I am more than a little confused as to what people who don't support the war or Bush sending troops to Iraq...now support the troops doing in Iraq? Whenever I hear it, it sounds like double-speak and an attempt to avoid being labeled anti-American by those who do support the war effort. The troops are there fighting a war, so does that mean you now support the reasons that Bush sent them there for? Please explain, as I have heard this often on TV (especially by actors and entertainers) and can't comprehend.

Dave H.



Title: Let me explain then
Post by: lswote on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Confused?, posted by Dave H on Apr 19, 2003

What it means is I am opposed to the war but I wish the best for the well-being of the troops and hope for their safe return.  It means I am not adopting the attitude of many Americans in the Vietnam war who opposed the war and called the troops just doing their duty "baby killers".  It means that now that the troops are committed to combat I hope they use every means at their disposal to be effective and achieve their goals.  But I do not believe we should have gone to war and I think President Bush started this war as a diversion from improprieties in his administration and his lacking credentials to be president.


Title: Re: Let me explain then
Post by: Peter Lee on April 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Let me explain then, posted by lswote on Apr 20, 2003

All this could be true or not, just more subjective rhetoric, anyway no way for us peons to ever know.  But the end result of one less dictator and more freedom for a people along with the power of one man controlling all that oil for who knows what.  Not to mention other dictators laying low and not making any trouble.   Keeping dis guy in power would have resulted in more than 100 deaths in the future for sure.  This police action to arrest criminals was called a war so the job could be done with less restrictions.  

I will never hear in detail from you an explanation with examples of why we should not have arrested these criminals and using the name war to get the job done.  
I will never hear from you your vague descriptions of improprieties you claim the Bush administration is guilty of. Will you give us a President who you believe never had any improprieties in there administration?  We all know that we have a corporate money machine that elects our presidents so very few had the credentials that really represented the people.  So tell us who under the corrupt system of past elections had more credentials to be president.

If you bother to answer I get a feeling it will have no facts just opinions and you know it is like assxxxxx everyone has one.
.  



Title: Probably...
Post by: Dave H on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Let me explain then, posted by lswote on Apr 20, 2003

...if we had waited and attempted to keep negotiating with a liar and madman as some people wanted, we could have surrendered to Saddam's Republican Guard on American soil. Which of Bush's lack of credentials are you refering to? His Masters of Business Administration from Harvard University or his Governorship of Texas? LOL

I am happy that you are "not adopting the attitude of many Americans in the Vietnam war who opposed the war and called the troops just doing their duty "baby killers"." I think that was more like a "few" Americans calling troops "baby killers", mostly in very liberal areas like San Francisco or near universities. It seems like it happened mostly to guys in military uniforms checking out anti-war protest rallies.

Dave H.



Title: Re: Probably...
Post by: lswote on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Probably..., posted by Dave H on Apr 20, 2003

Boy I don't know where you lived but where I lived, anti-troop sentiment was big-time on the television.

As far as my problem with Bush's credentials, I will let what Ron Reagan Jr. said comparing his father with Bush Jr. speak for me.

"The big elephant sitting in the corner is that George W. Bush is simply unqualified for the job... What's his accomplishment? That he's no longer an obnoxious drunk?" ... "My father had decades of experience in public life. He was president of his union, he campaigned for presidential candidates, he served two terms as governor of California -- and that was not a ceremonial office as it is in Texas. And he had already run for president, against Ford in '76, nearly unseating the sitting president in his own party. He knew where he was coming from, he had spent years thinking and speaking about his views. He didn't have to ask Dick Cheney what he thought." ... "



Title: On Television!
Post by: Dave H on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Probably..., posted by lswote on Apr 20, 2003

Hi Iswote,

I lived in Michigan and Miami during the Vietnam War and traveled throughout the Midwest and East Coast. I saw antiwar demonstrations on television too...and a few small demonstrations in person, where the TV cameras were pointed.  

Ron Reagan Jr....You can't do better than that??? ROFLMAOCUMMFLSAPIMGDP!!! As a former 'First Boy,' I am sure that Ron is jealous that he couldn't make his father proud, like George W. has! Ronnie Jr. is angry that he had to spend so many years hiding in the Governor's mansion and White House closets to protect his father's manly image. I am not exactly sure what Ron Reagan Jr. accomplished...but I'm told he was a very good dancer. It must have been tough living with a very conservative, 'straight' father. I think that Reagan was a good President, but as for qualifications...I hope my union president never gets elected to public office! I don't even back their political candidates! Public life as an actor or playing the President on TV doesn't count for much, unless you ask Martin Sheen. George W. doesn't have the acting experience, but the world now knows he means business...unlike Bill Clingon who could easily be bought with women, drugs, and money. If Clingon had surrounded himself with smart people who had some morals, and if he had any himself, we probably wouldn't be in the mess we are at present. As for George W., he wasn't my first choice, as I feel he is too nice a guy and a bit liberal for my tastes. ;o)))

Dave H.



Title: Bed time for Bonzo! lol n/t
Post by: Humabdos on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Probably..., posted by lswote on Apr 20, 2003

Let's not forget that! rotflmao!
HUM


Title: By the way
Post by: lswote on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Let me explain then, posted by lswote on Apr 20, 2003

I am an ex-Marine.  Siemper fi!


Title: Correction
Post by: Ray on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to By the way, posted by lswote on Apr 20, 2003

That should be “Semper Fi” (not “Siemper Fi”), short for the Latin “Semper Fidelis" (Always Faithful).

Any Marine should know that! And I’m only a sailor... :-)

Ray



Title: Correction accepted
Post by: lswote on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Correction, posted by Ray on Apr 20, 2003

Yes you are right.  I have been learning Spanish lately and I transliterated a mixture of the Latin word for for always "semper" and the Spanish word for always "siempre" and came up with "siemper".  I had expected learning Spanish to be easier than it turned out to be and sometimes my spelling gets overwelmed by it.


Title: I can relate to that!
Post by: Dave H on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Correction accepted, posted by lswote on Apr 20, 2003

Hi lswote,

I don't usually spell in Latin, but my English spelling has suffered tremendously since I learned Spanish. My Spanish spelling is great, however. :o)))

Dave H.



Title: Enlisted or Drafted? (n/t)
Post by: Dave H on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to By the way, posted by lswote on Apr 20, 2003

N/T


Title: Enlisted 1972 n/t
Post by: lswote on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Enlisted or Drafted? (n/t), posted by Dave H on Apr 20, 2003

n/t


Title: God Bless & Thank You! (n/t))
Post by: Dave H on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Enlisted 1972 n/t, posted by lswote on Apr 20, 2003

N/T


Title: Re: Confused?
Post by: Ray on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Confused?, posted by Dave H on Apr 19, 2003

Me too Dave!

I have to laugh whenever I hear that ridiculous crap. Why don't the anti-war demonstrators ask the troops if they think they are being supported by their protests. ROTFLMGDAOTNTPIMGDP!

Ask them! The troops will tell you what they think of your phoney "support".

Ray



Title: I Have A Plan!
Post by: Dave H on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Confused?, posted by Ray on Apr 19, 2003

Hey Ray,

Last night when I was about to fall asleep, an idea came to me. Since these anti-American, errr...I mean anti-war protesters have the right to free speech, lets help them do it in an orderly manner, without causing civil disobedience, breaking laws, and taxing our police departments. I believe that they should be required to rent sports arenas, such as football stadiums, to stage their protests. They will have the opportunity for great camera coverage and get big scoreboard screen playback for instant self-gratification. Also they will pay the cops for their off-duty stadium security detail time. This would also protect them from being run over in the streets by cars, trucks, and SUV's driven by us warmongers. ;o)))

Dave H.



Title: Better yet...
Post by: Ray on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to I Have A Plan!, posted by Dave H on Apr 19, 2003

Maybe we can save them a few bucks. Camp Pendleton has plenty of available space and I'm sure there are plenty of off duty marines on base who would be overjoyed to provide "security" on a volunteer basis. The protesters could march around the parade grounds with their idiotic signs that say "No Blood for Oil"... ROTFLMAOTNTPIMGDP!

Ray



Title: I Like It!
Post by: Dave H on April 20, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Better yet..., posted by Ray on Apr 20, 2003

Hi Ray,

That would also allow the soldiers another form of PT. ;o))) My original idea was internment camps, but I have become 'soft' as the war is winding down.

Dave H.



Title: Re: Leaving it here will be fine
Post by: Dingo on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Leaving it here will be fine, posted by lswote on Apr 18, 2003

I'm not Anti-war as Hum says. War can be a good thing for
the right reasons. I will say I'm Anti-BUSH(s).

I'm very happy for the people of Iraq, I have Iraqi friends
and they are happy as well.
It's just that Mr. Bush has multiple agendas two of which
is OIL and avoidance of our economic problems at home.
That is a FACT.
I have a couple of Anti-war Liberals at my work and I have
to listen to their crap all day.

BUT there is and can be a middle road here.
It doesn't have to be Anti-war or Pro-war only.
There can be a middle ground.

I know most of the posters here are middle aged white good
ole' Americans...YEEEE HAWWWW !!!!!! I'm just not one of them.
BUT I do share the common interest here of relationships with
Filipina's and Philipino Culture.

If it was up to the majority of our Republican  Politicians
there would be little or no Immigration to the US by
ASIANS.

Once again, I'm glad Saddam is gone, I support our troops,
I hope North Koreans can be freed next. I just don't like
Mr. Bush never have never will, He reminds me of a deer
stuck in a set of head lights and I find him very disingenuine.

Things to think about:

1.) War is entertaining

2.) War is great for the Media. Think of all the increased    viewership and therefore advertising Revenue $$$

3.) The US has a new 21,000 pound bomb capable of
creating 1,500 new Terrorist with a single blast.

4.) Freedom Toast? Freedom Fries?, what next Freedom Kissing?
LOL



Title: The Big Liberal Lie
Post by: Ray on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Leaving it here will be fine, posted by Dingo on Apr 18, 2003

"It's all about oil"

Correction: You may "think" that it's about oil, but that doesn't make it a "FACT". It's still only your opinion...

Ray



Title: Re: The Big Liberal Lie
Post by: Peter Lee on April 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to The Big Liberal Lie, posted by Ray on Apr 18, 2003

What is wrong with it being about oil????


Oil is power and in the wrong hands headaches.


Don't seem to complicated.




Title: Re: The Big Liberal Lie
Post by: Dingo on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to The Big Liberal Lie, posted by Ray on Apr 18, 2003

No It is YOUR Opinion that it is only my opinion.
It is a FACT that it is about oil. Anyone with
2 working eyes and 2 working ears can see and hear that it
IS in fact about oil. The key here is, it is not ONLY
about oil.
I never said it is "only" or "all" about oil so please do
not put words in my mouth.
It is about other things as well.

Is it about?

Finishing what his father did not? Yes
Terrorism? Yes
World stability? Yes
Political Gain? Yes
Peace in the Middle East? Yes
A show of force to the world that we are #1 and we are in control? You bet and
we are.
Eliminating one of the "axix of evils"? Yep
Protecting America's Oil interest? Yes again.

Cheers Dingo



Title: Re: Re: The Big Liberal Lie
Post by: Peter Lee on April 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: The Big Liberal Lie, posted by Dingo on Apr 18, 2003

I think we can all agree


Title: Re: Re: The Big Liberal Lie
Post by: outwest77 on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: The Big Liberal Lie, posted by Dingo on Apr 18, 2003

Agreed , but, how is it about Oil, as in , we are going to go over to iraq and control the oil, How are we going to control the oil, if we wanted to take over the oil fields, we had control of those in 91?, just exactly how do you define our "oil interests"..........iraq as a supplier of oil which we purchase? or........taking over the oil fields?


Title: Re: Re: Re: The Big Liberal Lie
Post by: Peter Lee on April 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: The Big Liberal Lie, posted by outwest77 on Apr 19, 2003

I think a little of both and done so no one will really know.


Title: Eyes Wide Open! 8oO
Post by: Dave H on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: The Big Liberal Lie, posted by Dingo on Apr 18, 2003

...we got a lot of oil out of Vietnam didn't we! Those French bastards screwed us there too and what political party got us deeply involved in a war..."Hee Haw!"

"Finishing what his father did not? Yes"

Very true since Clinton didn't get the job done! What was 'Desert Fox' anyway...where Clinton chased scantily clad women around the desert? It's also important to remember who didn't allow George H.W. Bush to finish the job the first time when he and General Schwarzkopf were more than willing to...The UN and certain members, like the French...

Dave H.



Title: Re: Eyes Wide Open! 8oO
Post by: Dingo on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Eyes Wide Open!  8oO, posted by Dave H on Apr 19, 2003

You're right. I'm sure George Bush Senior would have
crushed Saddam back then if he could have.
As for the oil we should take some to pay for the war effort.

As for Clinton:

"Bush announced he's pulled out of the 1978 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. ... I think this is the biggest thing a president has pulled out of since Monica" —David Letterman

"Last night in Canada, Bill Clinton told a Jewish group that if Iraq attacks the Middle East, he would personally pick-up a rifle and fight for Israel. The only place he won't fight, is if it's anywhere near Southeast Asia. ... Would you want Clinton fighting with you? We already know his aim is terrible."  —Jay Leno

"It's tax time and former President Clinton is reporting he made over $2 million last year, and that's not including what he got under the table." —Craig Kilborn

"Here is the basic difference between the Bush family and the Clinton family. When Bill Clinton said it was time for a cold one, he meant Hillary."  —Jay Leno

Ok and one for Bush although Clinton is easier to make fun of.

TOP 10 GEORGE BUSH SLOGANS

1) I'll turn capital punishment into a new game show!
2) I promise to get cocaine off our streets: 1 kilo at a time.
3) I'll finish what Bill started -- the interns.
4) Like father, like son. You liked my dad, right?
5) Vote for the GOP, Not OPP.
6) I promise no sex scandal: just look at me.
7) New penal plan: I won't use mine!
8) Read my lips: Al Gore Sucks.
9) George W. Bush: No hang-ups. Just hangovers
10) Vote for Bush and against Common Sense.

And one for the rest of the board.

The Check is in the Mail.
What is " A checkoslavakian Mail-order Bride.

Cheers



Title: Re: Re: Eyes Wide Open! 8oO
Post by: stefang on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Eyes Wide Open!  8oO, posted by Dingo on Apr 19, 2003

11) Gummy pretzels for all Americans


Title: Now That Was Funny!
Post by: Dave H on April 19, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Eyes Wide Open!  8oO, posted by Dingo on Apr 19, 2003

[This message has been edited by Dave H]

Hi Dingo,

ROFLMAO!!! I once told my neighbor she looked like a thin Monica Lewinsky. She replied "Thanks a lot!" and angrily stomped back into her house. So much for my attempt at a great pick-up line! :o))) Unlike Bill, the Kennedys had great taste in women! If I had mentioned any one of their ladies I probably would have been in like Flynn!

Wouldn't it be nice if we could use some of the Iraqi oil profits to help pay for the war. :o) I sure hope we use their profits to help the Iraqi people and rebuild the country.

Dave H.



Title: Blanket statement???
Post by: SteveB on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Leaving it here will be fine, posted by Dingo on Apr 18, 2003

The republican representive from our area did in fact help us with our visa!  As far as the economy, it was due for a down turn, it runs in cycles.  Clinton was a joke,,,a dirty Monica joke...He brought much shame to our country. I really think if we didn't play out this hand of fighting terrorists, they would continue to attack us, both here in the USA and abroad.  If we want freedom for future americans, we have to fight for it.  Proud of our president and very proud of the soldiers...USA all the way!  I would also back a democratic president if they thought we needed to fight.  

Steveb



Title: Re: Blanket statement???
Post by: SteveB on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Blanket statement???, posted by SteveB on Apr 18, 2003

P.S.  The media is very Liberal,,,which Bush is not.


Title: Good for Hum...
Post by: SteveB on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Take your ..., posted by Humabdos on Apr 18, 2003

Hum,, would you please state your opinion,,quit pu$$y- footing about it....just kidding

Steveb



Title: Give Her to me
Post by: greg on April 17, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to help, posted by Febtember on Apr 17, 2003

your Buddy looooool(joking)


Title: PARDON....but Don2222 & Cebu Info.
Post by: Stephen on April 17, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to help, posted by Febtember on Apr 17, 2003

Folks:

Pardon me for breaking the thread, but Tess & I are here in CDO at an internet station and there is no "POST NEW THREAD" button.  The only way I can post a message is by responding to another thread.  I appologize for the rudeness to Febtember.

So.....Don2222....are you still in Cebu?  Tess and I will be headed there on monday and would like to have a meal with you if you are interested.  Post here or contact me at sdbrittain@nospam.com.

And Fellas....what hotel should we stay at?  I've heard of Eddies.  Give me some ideas.  I want hot/cold water, Air conditioning, and clean.  Please give phone number and address if possible.

Thanks for the help.

Stephen



Title: Re: PARDON....but Don2222 & Cebu Info.
Post by: tpdtom on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to PARDON....but Don2222 & Cebu Info., posted by Stephen on Apr 17, 2003

Stephen....I can personally give a hearty endorsement to the Cebu Marriott . It's located right next to the Ayalla Mall too . They are running a promo now for P2800 including the breakfast buffet which will keep you going all day . Deluxe service and cushy room here . If it's in your budget to stay here you'll thank me later . Here's a link for the promo .

http://www.asiatravel.com/cebu/marriott/index.html

regards....Tom



Title: Re: help
Post by: jon on April 17, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to help, posted by Febtember on Apr 17, 2003

Gee, I'm 39 and never married.

Jon



Title: Re: help
Post by: Jeff S on April 17, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to help, posted by Febtember on Apr 17, 2003

Feb:
You should talk to her about her "never been married" requirement. As Hum says, good luck! No offense, Peter, but guys much older than 36 who've never been married usually have never been so for a good reason. Plenty of nice, devoted guys have their wives walk out on them in search of adventure, or end up as widowers, and would make great husbands. If it's because of her faith, OK, (as you described about yourself a few months back) but if it's because she thinks she'd be settling for a loser, you might want to fill her in on how some American women dump their husbands when they get the itch.

- Jeff



Title: Re: Re: help
Post by: Ray on April 17, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: help, posted by Jeff S on Apr 17, 2003

Jeff,

I think she means that the lady wants to be married in the church.

How about a nice, old, single Protestant Feb? LOL!

Ray



Title: I can help...
Post by: Dave H on April 17, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: help, posted by Ray on Apr 17, 2003

Hi Ray,

I have a 46 year-old Catholic friend who has never been married, but has lived with several women. He recently moved back into his mother's house and now has more money to spend on strippers and women he meets in bars...his favorite past-time. I think he would make a good husband candidate for a devout Filipina. PIMMFGDP!!!

Dave H.



Title: Re: I can help...
Post by: Ray on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to I can help... , posted by Dave H on Apr 17, 2003

Yep, sounds like he is about ready to settle down... CUMMFLTAHAIPCNTPIMMFP!

Ray



Title: Re: help: Calling Peter Lee!
Post by: Mita on April 17, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to help, posted by Febtember on Apr 17, 2003

Here's your chance.


Title: Re: Re: help: Calling Peter Lee!
Post by: lswote on April 18, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: help:  Calling Peter Lee!, posted by Mita on Apr 17, 2003

She's about 16 years too old for Peter.


Title: Re: Re: Re: help: Calling Peter Lee!
Post by: Peter Lee on April 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: Re: help:  Calling Peter Lee!, posted by lswote on Apr 18, 2003

I am glad your all thinking about me

But it seems that my sweetheart and I are going to get it together in late June - till then!!!

I will wait for her birthday coz I refuse to marry a teenager.



Title: Nope
Post by: Ray on April 17, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re: help:  Calling Peter Lee!, posted by Mita on Apr 17, 2003

Mita, I think Peter L likes them much younger than that, so he can "mold" them :-)

Ray



Title: Re: Nope
Post by: Peter Lee on April 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Nope, posted by Ray on Apr 17, 2003

Da older ones want to mold me.

The younger ones will ride the bike for hours with me go sailing for days and help in my Tae Bo classes.

The older ones will want to go for a drive grow plants on da boat and go to Tae Bo to get in shape

Oh decisions, decisions



Title: Never been married?
Post by: Humabdos on April 17, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to help, posted by Febtember on Apr 17, 2003

She is 36 and wants somone much older who has never been married? Good luck!

Hey wait I heard about a preist who lost his job last year.

Hum ;-)  



Title: Re: Never been married?
Post by: Peter Lee on April 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Never been married?, posted by Humabdos on Apr 17, 2003

I do qualify

I am older and neve been married -  - Yet!

Good luck???



Title: Re:widower is accepted
Post by: Febtember on April 17, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Never been married?, posted by Humabdos on Apr 17, 2003

According to her when I talk to her this morning in the phone she accept widower.And maybe a divorce catholic whom the first married is outside the church(civil) like Ray's case.


Title: Re: Re:widower is accepted
Post by: Peter Lee on April 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Re:widower is accepted, posted by Febtember on Apr 17, 2003

Picky, picky

What has she been doing for 36 years may we ask?



Title: Nice Try!
Post by: Dave H on April 17, 2003, 04:00:00 AM
... in response to Never been married?, posted by Humabdos on Apr 17, 2003

Sorry Hum,

It won't work! He likes much younger boys.

Dave H.