Title: Visa question for Ukraine Post by: Frank O on August 11, 2005, 04:00:00 AM I just checked the Ukraine embassy in the USA web site. According to what I read & UNDERSTOOD (which could be wrong) I read that
1.) IF you have visited the Ukriane WITHIN the last 6 months a visa is NOT required. Ok so if it's 8 month you WOULD need a visa correct? I'm being told 2.) that IF your visit is for LESS than 90 days it does NOT require a visa however I can't find that in the Ukraine ebmassy website. Can anyone clarify this or do I need to e mail (YIKES!) the embassy myself? Title: US Citizens - No Entry Visa Required!! Post by: RickM on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Visa question for Ukraine, posted by Frank O on Aug 11, 2005
Ukraine Sets Visa Free Regime for Revisiting U.S. Citizens Please, be informed that the President of Ukraine signed the Decree No. 1008/2005 “On the Establishment of Visa-Free Regime for Citizens of the United States of America” on June 30, 2005. According to the mentioned Decree, starting July 1, 2005 visas are not required for the US citizens who reenter Ukraine within six months after their previous trip to Ukraine or transit through its territory for a period of up to 90 days with a valid American travel passport. For the US citizens who enter Ukraine with the purpose of employment, permanent residency, study and work at the diplomatic missions of the USA in Ukraine or with any other purpose if they are going to stay in Ukraine for more than 90 days, visas are required. Title: US citizens who reenter "or transit" up to 90 days Post by: RickM on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to US Citizens - No Entry Visa Required!! , posted by RickM on Aug 12, 2005
Sounds like 2 seperate types of USA citizens with valid passports... 1(Those with pvevious 6 month Ukraine passports...) and 2)Those who have valid passports and wish to transit Ukraine for a period of up to 90 days... ________________________________________________________ Ukraine Sets Visa Free Regime for Revisiting U.S. Citizens According to the mentioned Decree, starting July 1, 2005 visas are not required for the US citizens who reenter Ukraine within six months after their previous trip to Ukraine or transit through its territory for a period of up to 90 days with a valid American travel passport. For the US citizens who enter Ukraine with the purpose of employment, permanent residency, study and work at the diplomatic missions of the USA in Ukraine or with any other purpose if they are going to stay in Ukraine for more than 90 days, visas are required. Title: Re: US Citizens - No Entry Visa Required!! Post by: LP on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to US Citizens - No Entry Visa Required!! , posted by RickM on Aug 12, 2005
[This message has been edited by LP] ....I see what you mean. No visa is required as the entry stamp in the passport would denote the previous entry. So I'm wrong that entry could be done without possession of a vaild visa. Then again, since the typical visa is good for 6 months the point is moot. But a visa is still needed for a first trip or if 6 months elapses. That isn't an issue for guys who have lots of time off and can travel cheap but it's nearly useless for those who get a few weeks per year and must pony up for the fare. It's a step forward for UA though. Title: Re: Re: US Citizens - No Entry Visa Required!! Post by: lawcom on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: US Citizens - No Entry Visa Required..., posted by LP on Aug 12, 2005
A few weeks ago Red Star Travel, the travel agency that has processed my visa requests to Ukraine in the past, advised me that the UA consulate in DC is not even accepting visa requests from US citizens because they are no longer required. The UA website indicates no visa required only if you plan more than one visit within 6 months, but it seems in practice no visa is required at all. Delta Airlines also states no visa required for UA (nothing about the 6 months reentry requirement). Check out Delta's website for passport and visa info: http://www.delta.com/planning_reservations/plan_flight/international_travel_information/visa_passport_information/index.jsp. So, who's gonna be the brave one to try it? I'd be interested to know what the real scoop is. Title: No Visa! Post by: Jack on August 13, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Re: US Citizens - No Entry Visa Requ..., posted by lawcom on Aug 12, 2005
The real scoop is you do not need one. Now two people I know, one a client, who have never been to Ukraine before, who have gone without a visa. One man has been back for a few weeks and one client is there as we speak. No visa is required to enter Ukraine if you are going as a tourist and your stay is less than 90 days. Title: Re: Re: Re: US Citizens - No Entry Visa Required!! Post by: Travis on August 13, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Re: US Citizens - No Entry Visa Requ..., posted by lawcom on Aug 12, 2005
Sounds like the "peguin theory of life" :-) Title: WITHIN 6 months of their PREVIOUS trip Post by: Frank O on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to US Citizens - No Entry Visa Required!! , posted by RickM on Aug 12, 2005
That's what I'm getting at. If it's been more than 6 months you DO NEED A VISA. Title: No, you don't need a visa. Post by: T P Cornholio on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Visa question for Ukraine, posted by Frank O on Aug 11, 2005
You don't need a visa for traveling to Ukraine for less than 90 days within a six month period. The Ukrainian newspapers have reported as such from offical government news releases, and the consulate sites have an interpretation problem that they are (as usual) slow to correct. The air carriers are not requiring a visa, and they would see heavy fines for letting people travel without one. Title: Re: Visa question for Ukraine Post by: LP on August 11, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Visa question for Ukraine, posted by Frank O on Aug 11, 2005
...This ain't rocket science people. The typical private stay visa (don't apply for a tourist visa) is a single entry visa with a duration of 6 months. Based on that the way I understand all this is: 1) As a US citizen you still need a visa to make your first trip. 2) You get the typical visa mentioned above. 3) You go. 4) You can go again within six months but can stay for only 90 days. Repeat as desired. 5) Beyond six months you need a new visa, assuming the original visa was a typical single entry 6 monther. (If it was a multi-entry visa of greater than 6 months duration this is all moot). In effect the new rule basically renews the typical single entry 6 month visa as long as you enter again within six months. It simply negates having to go through the application process again and coughing up the fee. However, note that you're limited to a 90 day stay if using this "grandfathered" visa. This is in contrast to an allowed 6 month stay using the visa in it's "original" form. Note also that if you bug out of Ukraine during your trip this new decree should cover your re-entry. (Advantageous for taking her someplace). That's my take on it. If anyone knows different speak up. Fwiw, I still feel a better route is to obtain a multi year, multi entry visa. Fwiw, a condensed version of the decree itself. (I like the part about fostering contracts in "all fields of relationships". Somehow I doubt they were talking about MOB): President's Decree No. 1008/2005 On Introduction of Visa Free Regime for US Citizens With the aim to develop and realize into practice principles of the strategic partnership between Ukraine and the United States of America and guided by the aspirations to simplify the regime for mutual travels and to foster bilateral contacts in all fields of relationships, I issue a decree: To introduce on July 1, 2005 visa free regime for the US citizens for entering Ukraine and for transit through the territory of Ukraine, if they visit Ukraine for the second time within 6 months from the date of their first visit to Ukraine for the period which doesn't exceed 90 days. The President of Ukraine Viktor Yushchenko June 30, 2005
If you want clarification Frank I suggest you send an email *and* pick up the phone. Do it for multiple embassies/consulates. Ask them about the points I made. Or check with the US State Dept. They should know and you should have better luck reaching them. I thought you were going to Colombia? Becoming a tad erratic aren't we? Not a good sign. You just got yer ass whooped remember? Just what is it with you and the marriage thing anyway? Are you that lonely? You're beginning to come across as a real desperado. Title: Basically..... Post by: Philb on August 11, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Visa question for Ukraine, posted by LP on Aug 11, 2005
this is Ukraine's diplomatic tit for tat. I don't know if most are aware of this, but, at the beginning of June, the US waived the $65.00 fee for Ukrainian citizens to obtain a multiple entry visa to enter the USA. Now there is only the $100.00 application fee for all tourist visas (I am not sure about other types of visas) for Ukrainian citizens. It used to be $100.00 for the application plus visa fees as follows $10.00 for double entry and $65 for multiple entry. Ukraine charged US citizens the same fees. Basically Ukraine is trying to do away with multiple entry fees with their new schedule. But in typical FSU fashion the wording is obtuse and the bureaucracy doesn't know how to interpret this. Title: So you understood it the same way as me Post by: Frank O on August 11, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Visa question for Ukraine, posted by LP on Aug 11, 2005
that's what I read on it LP. However Jack has told me his clients have gone recently WITHOUT a visa. I simply did not want to make a 20+ hour trip only to have to stay at Boryspol. I WILL call or e mail myself to the embassy. As for me going to Colombia...I AM going to Colmbia. I'm ALSO going back to Ukraine. Something wrong with that? Having said that not going ANYWHERE till at least October. Got my ass whooped?! well ok I did. So what am I supposed to settle for an AW now or go gay? I don't think so man. Title: So you're not gay?.... Post by: LP on August 11, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to So you understood it the same way as me, posted by Frank O on Aug 11, 2005
...I dunno, you've always struck me as a happy-go-lucky kinda guy ;) I seriously doubt any US citizens entered Ukraine without a visa of some form. Euro folks can do it until Sept 1 as I understand it though. "Settle" for an AW? Yeah Frank, you could. Most everyone else in the US does. There are plenty of good ones out there. Maybe not as many 21 year old trophies as you'd like but plenty of good ones who are nevertheless looking for exactly same things you are and are way less of a risk. But you don't really want that do you? Instead you want other, more shallow traits, for purely self centered reasons. Why is it that MOB men condemn AW for shallowness and then go abroad armed with the same? It's the height of hypocrisy. If you're to the point where you really think FSU women are "better" in ways that truly matter in a partner, in ways that will power a relationship over a lifetime, then you're further gone than I thought. I remind you billions of people the world over "settle" for marrying their own kind and are just as happy as any MOB couple. Jeez Frank, do you *honestly* believe MOB guys have stumbled onto some great secret of maritial happiness? One that the rest of the world doesn't know about? Good grief, you'd have to be seriously screwed up to believe that. The "problem" doesn't lie with any particular brand of women Frank, it lies with MOB men. It lies with you. The sooner you wise up to this basic truth the better off you'll be and the sooner you'll find real happiness. And that wasn't the source of my puzzlement anyway, it was why you're in such a headlong rush to be married in the first place, why you seem to feel the need to depend on another individual for happiness or to feel complete...so much so you're willing to go through what you already have and whatever awaits in the future. Title: Ok now your just rambling buddy Post by: Frank O on August 11, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to So you're not gay?...., posted by LP on Aug 11, 2005
I TRY to be a happy go lucky kind of guy. Look I get my share of Pu$$! being a musician just because of WHERE I work man. But dude I don't want the one nighters for anything else man. Sorry but I got over that by the time I was 24 (I'm going on 37). I was HAPPILY married for 6 years to my first wife. I'd like that back man. Nothing wrong with that .My first was a Mexicana. If I could & DID find an AW that could be what I wantd I'd marry her in a heartbeat man. Just haven't found one. Like I've said in other posts You go out on dates & everything is cool as soon as you mention you are not looking for casual sex or dating but are looking for marriage & CHILDREN then suddently it's over. No prob there other than that's what I want. As to why I want to be married hey I've been single for QUITE a bit so nothing wrong in wanting what I had before. don't see what the crime is in that. The thing about the MOB scene for me is that when you meet someone the understanind right off the top is you ARE SEEKING A WIFE not a one night stand. As for a tropy wife that's not what I'm seeking. I wouldn't call my Uke wife a trophy wife. She was NOT ugly but I've dated MANY more beautiful than her (which messed her up when she saw the pics). It was NOT the looks that attracted me to her. Title: OK Frankie.... Post by: LP on August 11, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Ok now your just rambling buddy, posted by Frank O on Aug 11, 2005
...No need to get riled. Permit me the pleasure of more rambling: I think you missed a few of my points, one of which is you don't seem to be looking for an A/W. Not in the last few years at least. You seem to have focused (and still are) all your attention abroad. Nor do you have to have one night stands with the AW you were meeting. How hard have you been trying to do otherwise? And you're trying to convince me there are no AW who want to have a family? Come on, do you really believe that? What planet are you living on? Lol, I wonder how many guys wish they had your problem: that every women they meet is only looking for casual sex. Is that representative of the women in Texas? Since when? If that's the kind of women you're always meeting than you're looking in the wrong place, age group, galaxy, something. Whose fault is it you're dealing with those types? Whose fault is it you're dealing with the kind you've been meeting in the FSU? Or the one you married? You're the one doing the pickin' Frank. Here, chomp on this: http://tinyurl.com/55qjx There's nothing wrong with marrying a foreigner if you meet one in a "normal" way. But you're shopping for them in impoverished countries where their motivation for marrying you is anything but pure. Jeez, your recent experience alone should've shown you that. If you think otherwise you're more naive than I thought. And of course they understand you're seeking a wife, why else would you even be in those particular countries? Duh. How come you don't go to Spain or France? Or New Zealand? You know, where men are men and the sheep are nervous? Or any number of other countries? It's because there is no market, because the motivation for marriage in those countries would be based on something other than a desire on their part to escape or a desire on your part to snag something you can't get at home...and not because of the local talent. It ain't their fault, it's yours. You've been hoodwinked Frankie, sucked deep into the MOB ether. There is only one chance for your salvation. Come my son, come over to the Dark Side and pray with me: http://tinyurl.com/97ygr Btw, I wasn't refering to your ex-wife's looks. I'm aware of what she looked like. I know she was nothing to write home about but I was refering to her age. And if it wasn't her looks, what was it that attracted you to her? Was it her personality? Her desire to be wife and mother? Her fidelity? Are we talking about the same woman you just sent home? The one you picked in spite of all the red flags? You're awash in a sea of lemon juice Frank. As for you getting lots of action I'm also aware you're not quite the dashing leather clad rocker you make yourself out to be. So don't try and BS me Frank, I know better. My point still stands: As long as you're unwilling to face the fact the problem is yours and yours alone, either in attitude, technique, demographics, ignorance, or whatever, it's gonna be a rough ride. Sure, you may pull this off. Anyone can go over and find an FSU girl to marry, Lord knows there are plenty of FSU women looking specifically for "easy" guys like you. But the odds of you being happy, no, the odds of you staying happy, are much slimmer when compared to doing it the normal way, and for the right reasons. Btw, what happened to this wonderful 6 year marriage of yours? Lemme guess: Whatever happened was mainly her fault right? Most MOB guys blame the woman you know. They haven't learned the only thing common in every one of their failed relationships was themselves. Ah well. It's your life Frank, not my place to tell you how to run it...but you'd better not come cryin' again. Title: You've got me worried LP Post by: Patrick on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to OK Frankie...., posted by LP on Aug 11, 2005
Church of Reality??? Oh my Reality! You haven't been sucked into a cult have you? If you hear anything about "joining Reality (do they capitalize reality?) on the tail of a commet" get the hell out of there. You're the last person I would have expected to get sucked into a "mail order religion". Is it the non-religiousness of the religion that appeals to you? Do we need to send out a team to deprogram you? I think it's time you had a kid. Your profile says you've been married since 2000. Is that true? I might be tempted to join the Church Of Reality myself if it weren't for the fact that my two year-old daughter takes up pretty much all of my spare time. Diapers, skinned knees, and reading the potty training story book keep me from contemplating "reality" too much. I figure by the time she's out of the house alzheimers will most likely keep me from any further contemplation. Title: Lp in a cult? Church or Reality? Post by: Frank O on August 13, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to You've got me worried LP, posted by Patrick on Aug 12, 2005
Sorry since I didn't read all of his diatribe on his post & simply skipped from the begining after I woke up having snoozed through it to the end. I must have missed that. O well I ain't going to read all of it so I'm ASSuming LP has gone off in the land of the cults? WHo knows he could probably start his own. There's always good $$ in religeon. As for 2 legged tumors or whatever it was he called them I woudln't mind having one of mind own soon. For now I"ll have to settle fro my ex's Doberman. Title: Potty training book? Post by: LP on August 13, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to You've got me worried LP, posted by Patrick on Aug 12, 2005
I guess that Heaven's Gate thing still has you folks spooked down there eh? Fear not, I'm as solid as a rock...at least until the Mother Ship arrives. I really oughta check out the stuff people send me before I use it but now that I've waded thru the Church Of Reality a lot of what the guy has too say makes sense. I was actually buying into some of it before I saw he's a redneck from West Virginia who came up with all that while on the wacky tabacky. Lol, talk about being a hypocrite. I still believe mainly as he does though: you have to deal with the way things are, anything else is a delusion. Me married? You gotta be kidding. Has to be vicious rumor perpetrated by my enemies. A kid? No way, kids are for people who've never had them. I already have two from a marriage in a galaxy far, far away. In fact I'm a grandfather twice over. Besides, birthing another two-legged tumor now would severely cramp my style. My squeeze and the dog give me enough grief as it is. But she's a good dog, turns out she'll let anyone eat out of her bowl...no matter how drunk he is ;) Title: Re: Potty training book? Post by: Patrick on August 15, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Potty training book?, posted by LP on Aug 13, 2005
Thank God (I mean Reality) you're not really into that religion. "Two-legged tumor"??? Are you telling me the thrill of parenthood wears off at some point? Is it when they're still living with you in their 30s that it gets old? I've got that covered. I plan on being either dead or incapacited with Alzheimers by that time, so I'll either avoid it all together, or not relize it's happening. Title: Living at home when they're 30?.... Post by: LP on August 18, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Potty training book?, posted by Patrick on Aug 15, 2005
[This message has been edited by LP] ...Lol, I see you've stumbled onto one of my categories of MOB men you asked about earlier. No, fraid not. It'll get unpleasant in about half that time. Your Princess Buttercup is still at the 'lil darling stage but they all go downhill at around 13. It's even worse with girls. But look on the bright side: She'll have learned to use the potty by then ;) Gets better once they leave the nest as long as they don't return or you end up having to deal with their divorces, financial or legal screwups, ect. If you're real unlucky you might even end up raising their kid(s). Then it's all downhill again as you become elderly and they begin circling over your assets like vultures. I dunno, sometimes I think I should've just gone out for a pack of smokes and never came back. Or harvested their organs for beer money and been done with it. Anyway, you have my sympathies well in advance ;)
Title: OK LP Post by: Haroshij on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to OK Frankie...., posted by LP on Aug 11, 2005
Ah well. It's your life Frank, not my place to tell you how to run it...but you'd better not come cryin' again. I think you have no right to tell Frank not to come back and tell about another misery. This is the place for doing it, and as far as I remember a lot of guy thanked him for sharing with them. You are not obligated to get engaged in his life and problems, and his problems are not yours. In other words, Frank has the right to share with us his problems even if you don't like it. However, I think many men seeking a foreign bride are unrealistic and believe they leave their problems behind them when they go to a foreign country. I, myself has adviced Frank to look for a woman in his own country. I don't think he took that advice seriously. I tried to enlist some of the problems with living with a foreign women, and there could be more to that list, but I got a feeling he wouldn't listen and is seduced by the beautiful ladies he can find in the catalogs and knowing they are within reach. Frank has openly and somewhat naive told us about his failure. Most guys here have showed him their sympathy. Your letter is of a different nature. I think, if you really would like to do something good for Frank, you would have reveal a little more sympathy and understanding. I think you hurt him by your posts, and that was not necessary unless you wanted to demonstrate something for yourself. Title: Re: OK LP Post by: LP on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to OK LP, posted by Haroshij on Aug 12, 2005
1) Of course I have no right to tell anybody what to do about anything. I'm sure most everyone understood what I meant by the comment. Regardess of what I (or anyone) says Frank will continue to do as he wishes. That he will likely continue to pay a price for doing so will be his burden to bear and is of no concern of mine. 2) This is a place for telling about such miseries as his? You've got to be kidding. 3) Along with others, I too offered sympathy for his situation. Was that not a violation of your "us not being obligated to engage in his life and problems" statement? Sorry, you can't have it both ways. And considering the background and cuase of his problem, exactly what was Frank "sharing" with us that had any real value? Any benefit gained in doing so was his, not ours. 4) Those who responded were few compared to the number of those here. I'll wager the vast majority of those who didn't respond felt quite differently about Frank and his problem. You're failing to consider them. 5) Hurt him? If Frank is a big boy he'll hardly be hurt by anything said on an internet board. And if he can be, he ought to consider that before posting intimate details of his life, especially blantant screw ups. I doubt he's anywhere near the marshmellow you're coming across as. 5) That Frank is naive is an gross understatement but that is the least of his problems. 6) That many MOB men are unrealisitc is another but you're either ignorant or ignoring why they're unrealistic. I am not and do not. 7) In case you haven't noticed, my posts are usually of a different nature. I don't think like most of these guys. That said, I've been in somewhat of a foul mood the last couple of days. I have good and bad periods, just like anyone else. Streetwise: I was kidding. It's no secret here what I think about any form of religion or cult. My point was that MOB (speaking of cults) men adjust "reality" to meet their needs, ignoring the way things really are. Some adjust so much they're barely hanging on. Worse, many in MOB enter it just barely hanging on.
Title: Re: Re: OK LP Post by: Haroshij on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: OK LP, posted by LP on Aug 12, 2005
To point 2. I'm not kidding. Why shouldn't this forum be a place to share experiences? Even bad ones? Point 3. Point 4. How can you elaborate that those who didn't reply have another opinion than those who replied. Do you know something the rest of us don't. It is more logic to assume that what was written is what most people thought. Point 5. You're apparently right. He says himself he was not hurt. Still I sense a sensitive feeling in his reply. And you are stilling trying to run over him. Point 6. it would be interesting to hear you elaborate this a little more. Point 7. I've noticed your posts are different. However, I'm not sure if it is so because you are different or just pretend to be different from the rest of us. I would be interesting to hear more about that. In fact I've always found it interesting to listen to people who is thinking differently, and I always defend their right to do so and the value of it. Title: Thanks but he didn't hurt me Post by: Frank O on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to OK LP, posted by Haroshij on Aug 12, 2005
just bored me. Honestly I couldn't even finish reading it man. Sorry LP. I"m a little tougher than that. Basically I don't CARE what people say or think. I DO listen to advise though & I have received much good advice. Once again I felt I MIGHT have helped someone out with my ordeal, which by the way I'm still smarting from. Kind of funny though how LP tried to insunuate my wife was NOT that attractive, she WAS she was just not "model" material. Far from a trophy wife. As for the "rocker" comment I could care less. Sex is not a problem believe me. PLuse I don't have to explain about my previous marriage (Of course it was HER FAULT) or whatever else. I think he's starting to believe he is the forum shrink & I'm plopping my feet on the couch. Anyways I'm bored & rambling. I have to get rid of this hangover. Title: Re: Thanks but he didn't hurt me Post by: LP on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Thanks but he didn't hurt me, posted by Frank O on Aug 12, 2005
...As I said Frankie, I'm having a bad week. Still, you make an easy target. "Honestly" you didn't finish reading the post? But the marriage and "her fault" comment was at the end? More self denial? Shrinks? I'm not a fan of the profession as I've had to deal with them for career related issues but they've instilled in me an interest of human behavior, including my own. So lay back on the couch and continue to tell us all about how you perceive yours. It's fascinating stuff. Hangover? I hope not as in ethanol. Little old for that kind of thing aren't you? Besides, I thought you guys prefered controlled substances? I'm just pulling yer chain Frank, no harm intended. I'm off to work tonight so everyone gets a break from my whackiness for a week or so. Title: Church of Reality??? Post by: Streetwise on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM Title: "Unskilled and Unaware of It" is absolutely fascinating Post by: TwoBitBandit on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to OK Frankie...., posted by LP on Aug 11, 2005
I couldn't stop reading it until I reached the end... Title: I can ramble too Post by: fathertime on August 11, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Ok now your just rambling buddy, posted by Frank O on Aug 11, 2005
Frankly Frank I do not see anything wrong with going for a MOB woman as long as you understand yourself and why you are doing it. AW's have been nothing but good to me through the years although now at age 37 I do not have the time and willingness to go and meet woman on dates or whatever people do my age to meet woman. I have also noticed that woman I find attractive do not have any interest in me. Be that as it may I go to Ukraine or Colombia and I am suddenly a rock star in the 80's again. I realize that it is ridiculous but it sure is nice. My thought is I am almost always lovable if given a chance but the AW's I want will not give me that opportunity just as I won't give the ugly ones that like me the opportunity. Another interesting note is I am as happy as I have ever been in my life. We will see if being married to a MOB brings me to even a higher plain of happeniness or knocks me into the dirt with misery. Anyway I am curious why exactly do you want a MOB instead of an AW? Soulds like you do pretty well for yourself with the AW woman whereas I do not? If I had good AW options I would probably forget all about MOB. Title: Re: I can ramble too Post by: LP on August 11, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to I can ramble too, posted by fathertime on Aug 11, 2005
Lol, you continue to be one of the shallowest guys I've ever seen grace this place but I gotta give you credit: At least you're self-aware and not living a delusion, you freely admit to being one of the messed up that mostly inhabit MOB. That's pretty rare in this biz so there may be hope for you yet. Then again, a guy who says he has no time and willingness to seek a mate at home but has the time and willingness to do so abroad implies a few cracks in the shell, so I'm not sure what to think ;) Oh and yeah, at 37 you're ready for the grave. Boo-hoo, yer breakin' my heart. I'd kill to be where you are... Title: Re: Re: I can ramble too Post by: fathertime on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: I can ramble too, posted by LP on Aug 11, 2005
I suppose I could be annoyed with your post but I actually I find it offbase, irrelevent, and a little bit sad. Yes I am a hypocrite I suppose. I do base my selection on physical appearance insofar as being initally interested in a woman. Explain to me what is the problem with this? After all physical attraction is part one of falling in love. My basis for being attractive is not all that stringent really, but if I do not find her where I am then I will do what it takes to bring her to me. Is'nt that why most of us are really doing this? As far as being messed up, I have to disagree with you in that respect and find that disrespectful and irresponsible to toss a label like that so indiscriminately. I behave well generally and those around me feel pretty good about me from what I can gather, so what do you base the "messed up part on"? What I do have is a very stong adversion to meeting woman that I mutually click with. I am just too damn quirky and extreme for my own good but that must have its perks or I would not be that way. Labeling me as "Shallow" is rather shallow on your part since it should take more than a few posts to determine that of a person. I would like to hear more from you because thus far I am not finding anything useful that I did not already know from your post about me but perhaps the next one will give me an insight that will inspire a change in my attitude. BTW I am not upset about being 37 there is no need for crocodile tears on this subject. Thank you for your interest Title: Re: I can ramble too Post by: LP on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Re: I can ramble too, posted by fathertime on Aug 12, 2005
...I'm glad you didn't find it annoying because it wasn't meant to be. Quirky instead of messed up? OK, fair nuff. But ya gotta admit, this statement: "What I do have is a very stong adversion to meeting woman that I mutually click with. I am just too damn quirky and extreme for my own good but that must have its perks or I would not be that way" would be considered by most to be a sign of more than quirkiness. My point was that men who seek foreign brides are viewed as being "different" (just ask the public in any country involved for their opinion) and you seem to fit that fit description quite well. It'd be interesting to know your past relationship history, number of marriages, relationships, their outcomes, ect. Care to enlighten me? Title: Re: Re: I can ramble too Post by: fathertime on August 12, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: I can ramble too, posted by LP on Aug 12, 2005
Different is a tag that I can live with rather than messed up. Although from what I saw on my Anastasia tour the men where generally pretty good guys but were delusional about what they could bring back home. As I looked out amoungst the mass of people during the tour I saw plenty of fairly normal men with a percentage of nutcases as well. Your assertion that most MOB men are messed up seems exaggerated to me unless your criteria for messed up is anyone with any problem. I will tell you a bit of my past but I would like to hear some of yours as well. You must have a first hand experience or two that something can be learned from. As a young man I did not have any serious relationships. I honestly was able to attract woman but just had no long term use for them. I shake my head in disgust when I think of how immature I was but I learned a lot along the way and was lucky to not be one of the guys who was always out in the cold with women. Thank you Title: Jack told me the same thing - verification anyone? Post by: papi on August 11, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Visa question for Ukraine, posted by Frank O on Aug 11, 2005
this would be my first trip ever to UKe. being told i do not need a visa Title: Re: Jack told me the same thing - verification anyone? Post by: david hagar on August 11, 2005, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Jack told me the same thing - verificati..., posted by papi on Aug 11, 2005
It sounds good traveling with the visa Beattledog |