Planet-Love.com Searchable Archives

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

FIRST DREAM LANDS SECOND BLOW AGAINST FORREST AND RWGUIDE: COURT ENTERS
INJUNCTION AGAINST FORREST AND THOSE ACTING WITH HIM FROM FILING ANY OTHER
LAWSUITS

Dallas, Texas - June 29, 2004
Dallas attorney Charles H. Steen announced today that a TRO - Temporary
Restraining Order - was signed by the Court today against Spencer Forrest,
and all those acing in concert with him, from filing or prosecuting any
legal actions anywhere except in the Dallas lawsuit.  The TRO specifically
names attorney Bradley J. Haskins - a Texas-licensed lawyer based in Prague
- as one of the persons enjoined from filing any lawsuits.

"The Court's order is an 'Anti-Lawsuit Injunction', " Steen said, "Its
purpose is to stop persons like Forrest from trying directly, or through
others, to gin up vexatious, harassing litigation outside the main action,
which in this dispute is Dallas, Texas."  Steen recounted, "Several pieces
of evidence were significant to the Court.  First, we presented Forrest's
emails with various agencies; Forrest was caught red-handed stating that
lawyer Haskins had advised them to file multiple, local lawsuits to give
Jack Bragg, President of First Dream, 'a headache beyond belief'.  Forrest
claimed in his emails to have three agencies on board, and a whole 'network
of attorneys' who would handle their lawsuits for minimal costs.  That
obviously was an abuse.  Moreover, it wasn't true, and it foolishly waived
any shred of attorney-client privilege between Forrest and Haskins."

"Second," according to Steen, "The Court took specific notice that lawyer
Haskins was under a formal grievance investigation being prosecuted by the
State Bar of Texas for various threats Haskins made against Mr. Bragg.
That, obviously, is very serious matter."  "Third," Steen continued, "We
presented a recent letter from Haskins, faxed from Europe on June 11th, in
which Haskins threatened that RWG's new owners - Central Europe Partners UKR
- would sue Bragg in Ukraine.  Of course we immediately joined the new owner
of RWG as a defendant, in Dallas, and obtained the injunction.
Astonishingly, Haskins - who knows full well that Mr. Bragg is represented
by counsel - faxed his letter directly to Mr. Bragg instead of his lawyer.
That resulted in a supplemental grievance being filed against Haskins at the
Texas State Bar."

"Fourth, Steen said, "we presented a petition that Forrest filed in Austin,
without a lawyer, against me personally, complaining about the way I am
representing Bragg and First Dream in the Dallas lawsuit.  That's just
crazy.  You can't ask a second Texas Court to take up what is already
pending in a first-filed matter.  That is like asking a second teacher to
change your 'F' from another teacher's class to an 'A'.  So, that lawsuit is
shut down."  "I guess you do sometimes hear about certain homeless people
doing this kind of thing - filing back-to-back pauper suits - but its
improper, and the Courts know how to handle these things.  One thing is
certain, however, if you violate an anti-lawsuit injunction, the Court can
throw you in jail.  We'll have to wait and see what happens."

"Not everything has been so serious, however," Steen said.  "There have been
some really hysterical moments.  When we sued Central Europe Partners, my
process server went to Spencer's home to serve him.  His truck and his car
were both there, so she was pretty darn certain he was there.  She rang the
door bell, and the dogs barked; but no one answered the door.  So, she rang
again, only this time the dogs didn't bark.  She rang several more times,
and it was the same thing.  This went on several times a day for two days."
"Eventually Spencer will have to tell me under oath if he was hiding in his
own house for two days avoiding my process server," Steen said.  "On Sunday
she went by his house just to see if he was there - in Texas we don't serve
process on Sundays - and most of us like it that way.  Anyway, Spencer must
have recognized her, because he jumped into his car and a few minutes later
was following her down the road.  This wasn't a high-speed chase or
anything, it was more like the OJ Simpson chase, entertaining but basically
just immature.  First Spencer was behind, then ahead, then along side, and
then both sides waived at each other, and did some of the silly sign
language people do in cars.  Ultimately it didn't matter though.  On Tuesday
we got a Court Order, and we served Central Europe Partners UKR by taping
the lawsuit to Spencer's door."

Steen closed by stating, "The amended lawsuit adds Central Europe Partners
UKR as a defendant, and asserts, among other issues, that the significant
business losses now being experienced by the new owners of RWGuide are
directly traceable to Forrest's failures fully to disclose the true measure
of tort liability he created for the business before the sale.  The amended
lawsuit puts it right out there, it says Forrest 'scammed' the new
investors.  When this lawsuit started, Forrest and Haskins pooh-poohed it
big time, publicly and privately, repeatedly calling it 'frivolous'.  I do
not know if they are starting to take us seriously yet, but I hope so,
because we are absolutely serious about this dispute."  Agreeing, Mr. Bragg
stated, "Look, I have been trying for years to get Forrest, and a few
others, simply to respect First Dream at a business level.  Instead, I am
banned from RWG, and called every bad name in the book.  When someone
reports something good on RWG about their experience with us, they are
attacked and accused of being a shill or me in disguise.  Well, that's just
wrong.  My name and First Dream's name were scrambled, were censored, and
whole discussion threads routinely get deleted if there is anything positive
said about us.  When I asked about pricing to put a banner on RWG, on par
with everyone else, I was flatly ignored.  It doesn't take a rocket
scientist to figure it out.  But it might take a jury and a judgment to make
it right."

Telephone calls to Forrest were not answered and, although numerous
voicemail messages were left, no calls were returned.

To obtain copies of the lawsuit or other Court papers, send your letter with
a SASE to:

Charles H. Steen, Esq.
The White House on Turtle Creek
2401 Turtle Creek Blvd.
Dallas, TX 75219
#     #     #

... in response to latest on RWG lawsuit, posted by Jack on Jun 30, 2004

on your legal victories against the hypocritical and fraudulent Spencer Forrest. He deserves to be shut down.

-blm

... in response to Congratulations..., posted by BarryM on Jul 3, 2004

Hello Barry, it is nice to hear from you!

I hope Patrick can save your IP address, remember cameragirl is on record stating he is 100% sure you and your blm at ev1.net are really me.  

Two other guys with ev1.net e-mails, Timber and davidNB27, were recently banned because they are me also!!  It's hilarious,..... can you say paranoid?

... in response to Re: Congratulations..., posted by Jack on Jul 5, 2004

Hi Jack,

I have, at last count, 6 email addresses. Only one of them is at ev1.net. Ev1 has been filtering so much spam that I often miss a lot of good email. My network is behind a firewall and a NAT so my actual IP address is on the non-routable 192.168.0.0 subnet. I don't have the blm@ev1.net email address. Someone else beat me to it.

A discussion board is only as good as its participants. Cameragirl is a chief instigator of harrassment on Spencer's board and he has been ever since I can remember. To allow such a nasty viscious individual to moderate shows the true character of Spencer. They're all a bunch of punks over there.

On the record:
I have not posted on Spencer's board since I was banned. I don't waste my time in a cesspool. I have not viewed his board since he changed the software and required registration. The first email I used on his board was flooded with porno spam. I suspect he sold my email address along with many others. This was more than 2 years ago before porno spam became such a problem. I deleted that email account because of the spam. I won't register to view his board because I believe he would sell my email address to the porno spammers.

Cameragirl is a lunatic and he can believe whatever he wants. It is not necessary for me to prove anything to that punk.

-blm

... in response to Re: Re: Congratulations..., posted by BarryM on Jul 7, 2004

I don't know who to believe here anymore BarryM.

On February 28, 2002 Cameragirl went onto his discussion board and proclaimed,......I don't THINK you're Barry M. And speaking of e-mail addresses, what happened to the blm2001@ev1.net address on your profile just an hour ago?  I KNOW you're Jack Bragg, and I already asked you not to squirm. I'm the type to more than give the benefit of the doubt to anyone if I'm not 100% sure, but you're SO busted, and it's about time you met your match. Don't think I didn't do a buttload of research before posting my conclusion......

So dorfus jb and the made up names being used by Drew and Claire all come to thank cameragirl for his great detective work.

Today moderator cameragirl went back and re-edited an earlier post's he made saying he does not trust me, OR my attack/lap dog BarryM. HEY, according to the trusted, ethical, honest camergirl, were one in the same! How can this be if he is "100% sure" that Jack and Barry are the same person? I mean 100% is 100%. Not 99% where their could be room for a mistake. 100% sure is 100% sure.

Who to believe, who to trust?

... in response to Who to Believe, WHO to believe?, posted by Jack on Jul 12, 2004

"Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience."

RWG seems to be a standard bearer of revised history these days. You can expect any post to be revised or forged to suit their evil purposes. They have no credibility. Silencing Spencer, cameragirl and the rest, putting them out of business, and making Spencer poor and destitute is a noble cause.

I still have the blm2001 user id so, sorry Jack, you can't have it. Maybe if I decide to dump ev1 altogether I'll let you pick them up.

-blm