|
Title: whatdaya think? Post by: LP on May 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM Here's the site I mentioned in an earlier post:
http://www.searchamazing.com/ Consider this: 1) There doesn't seem to be any plain looking girls or real skanks, most are decent looking....some are serious foxes. 2) Notice they're supposed to contact you, there is no way for you to contact them. Opposite of most agencies. Note the lack of names or profile data, only photos. 3) Notice many (but not all) of these girls don't look Slavic, nor do many of the backgrounds in the photos appear to be from FSU locales. (Look carefully at the room construction details or furniture.) Yet they're all represented as being FSU women. (I suppose some could be located in Western countries.) 4) The behavior and clothes in some of the photos looks suspisously un-FSU like. 5) There seems to be no way to contact the people who operate the site. 6) Note the link to an INS page claiming data for a 20% divorce rate vrs 48% for American marriages. 7) There is no cost involved (at least on the man's side) as far as I can tell. 8) The site bears a resemblance to www.hotornot.com (btw, a good place to have a photo evaled by others before you use it) but lacks that site's membership and contact features. Persuing the photos on hot or not will show a definate range of beauty (or lack of it) compared to this site. (And don't tell me it's because most FSU girls are dolls, I've seen better faces on passing freight trains than I've seen in the FSU.) Whats goin on here? Any opinions? Take a gander, if nothing else it makes for some nice eye candy. But if I were you, I'd want to know more before I put any of my info there. Title: I have seen it before. Post by: Bobby Orr on May 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to whatdaya think?, posted by LP on May 23, 2003
LP - It has been a while, but I believe the girls are not usually real. It is a way for them to get your information to send you mail to get you to pay a fee to join their agency - which is as you already know, a mistake. Thanks for trying. Title: Yea but, Post by: thesearch on May 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to I have seen it before., posted by Bobby Orr on May 23, 2003
has anyone here gone that far to find out? Some time ago I asked if anyone had received unsolicited e-mail with this site as I had. No one commented. I certainly was suspicious. Title: Re: Yea but, Post by: robobond on May 24, 2003, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Yea but,, posted by thesearch on May 23, 2003
if it smells like doo then don't step in it... Title: I guess Post by: thesearch on May 24, 2003, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: Yea but,, posted by robobond on May 24, 2003
I am curious what kind of doo they have. - not enough to step in it but wondered if anyone did and if so what did they find inbetween their toes. Title: Re: whatdaya think? Post by: robobond on May 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM Title: I'm with you... Post by: Philb on May 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM Title: The point.... Post by: LP on May 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to I'm with you..., posted by Philb on May 23, 2003
...is to show places where they'll come to you instead of using the lousy method of buying addresses. I could post a bunch more such sites but now I see you're right, there's no point. No loss to me, I've already got some fine quail. (lol, how that Burke? 70's enough for ya?) Title: LP Post by: BURKE89 on May 25, 2003, 04:00:00 AM Title: LP your no dummy..... Post by: Philb on May 24, 2003, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to The point...., posted by LP on May 23, 2003
[This message has been edited by Philb] and that is why I asked "What is the point?". I figured you made this post knowing that this was a scam. Title: Thanks for trying Post by: Bobby Orr on May 24, 2003, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to The point...., posted by LP on May 23, 2003
I appreciate you trying to show me and others ways to look under the rocks etc. to find a gem. This one is a 0 but your other one was fine. I for one could use and appreciate all help. Title: I think: Post by: BURKE89 on May 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM Title: Re: I think: Post by: DanM on May 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to I think:, posted by BURKE89 on May 23, 2003
I was thinking about mullets myself. Last time I heard some of those terms, the mullets ran proud and free. : ) Title: Mullets? Post by: BURKE89 on May 25, 2003, 04:00:00 AM Title: Re: Mullets? Post by: DanM on June 04, 2003, 04:00:00 AM Title: Just for you.... Post by: LP on May 23, 2003, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Re: I think:, posted by DanM on May 23, 2003
http://www.mulletsgalore.com/ The mullet is alive and well in the South, it's birthplace you know. Btw, you got me all wrong, I greatly like Southern folks. Just don't fathom why many are so limited in their depth of understanding. It's like they operate on the surface, using only what they can see around them. Then again, thats part of their charm I suppose. I'm still waiting for your FSU insights. For a guy married to a R/W you never offer much up. It'd sure beat than your Huey P. Long viewpoint of things. ;-) Title: Another thing Post by: DanM on June 04, 2003, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Just for you...., posted by LP on May 23, 2003
I am in no way like Huey P Long. I know its silly to expect you to speak about anything from an informed perspective since its not your style, but I was a little disappointed that you could miss this one so badly. Huey P Long was a populist and closer to a socialist than a modern day Democrat. How is that in any way like my posts? Did you even read my posts? Hello? Anyone home? Another example of your silliness I suppose. Title: Another Jab? Post by: DanM on June 04, 2003, 04:00:00 AM ... in response to Just for you...., posted by LP on May 23, 2003
Lets just say the subtle or tactful approach is not your strong point. It really seems like you go out of your way for insults whenever possible and its getting old. The funny thing is that you have no idea how sad and petty you make yourself look with all of your BS. As for your views on people from the southeastern US, its beyond lame. How can you slam so many millions of people that you do not know. Yes I can accept your comments about disliking some sad little stereo type you have built in your head. I am sure your characterization of a southern person is something we could all laugh at. The truth, however, is that your characterization is just plain wrong. If you were speaking about race instead of region, you would be a bigot or racisist or whatever word you wish to use. Hate without reason is pretty stupid and you are my personal example of this stupidity. As for my comments about Russian women, you are off there too. No, I do not limit myself to conversations on Russian women any more than you do. Like you, I write about any subject that interests me. For you to say that I do not write about Russian women or my expereinces, however, is just plain false. Go look through the archives if you do not believe me. Also look for the post where you praised my logic and reason. You talked about how well thought my points were, ,etc, etc. Seems like the only difference between someone you approve of and someone you do not is whether or not they agree with you. Do you have any idea how backwards and silly that is? You are just as bad as your ficticious characterization of people from the south. Go away or keep bothering me. At this point I do not care. If it really entertains you to look like an idiot in front of everyone on this board, then knock yourself out. |