... in response to Re: Re: Why is it?, posted by soltero on Nov 8, 2004I guess I should have been clearer but my attack was because of exactly what Patrick said. This guy has posted no real information about the purported scam and his post was full of bad spelling and poor grammar which points to lack of education in my opinon. Come on guys, we are people who have had to learn how to see red flags in women, and this "skill" now gets carried over in other areas, such as sizing up a newbie poster. I know we go round and round whenever someone points out spelling errors, but sometimes spelling errors point to a problem with the person, not just their spelling and that is how I feel about this poster.
That being said, I admit to jumping to conclusions and not taking the high road and giving this guy the benefit of the doubt. I apologize to rj556, though I realize it is a pretty hollow apology since in this post I further rationalized why I criticized him, but I now regret having said anything so soon.