Planet-Love.com Searchable Archives
February 12, 2026, 09:36:30 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: This board is a BROWSE and SEARCH only board. Please IGNORE the Registration - no registration necessary. No new posts allowed. It contains the archived posts from the Planet-Love.com website from approximately 2001 through 2005.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: New wife associating with illegal immigrants  (Read 24793 times)
Irmao
Guest
« Reply #15 on: October 14, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to "less desirable people"...You ..., posted by Seeker on Oct 14, 2004

most people try to keep that a secret.
Logged
soltero
Guest
« Reply #16 on: October 14, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to "less desirable people"...You ..., posted by Seeker on Oct 14, 2004

I have nothing against illegal immigrants, and there are "less desirable people" in any group including my own. Some of the people my wife was associating with would be considered "less desirable" in any group. I support anyone here who is working hard to have a better life, but I look at the people who make a joke out of the system and try to use loopholes and steal and sell drugs as a way of life as basura no matter where they were born. I have had a hard life and I have had a great life so I don't feel any need to be PC, just fair. If my post offended you, it is because you need to get out more. No one group has cornerd the market on being without sin no matter how hard some of them work or how much they contribute. You always have the bottom of the barrel in any group of people and those are who I was referring to.
Logged
Heat
Guest
« Reply #17 on: October 14, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to "less desirable people"...You ..., posted by Seeker on Oct 14, 2004

I suggest you re read his post he did not put down illegal immigrants.  He was talking about people who should not be associating with the dudes wife.  


Your post seems more about telling us how wonderful you are than anything that was written by the other guy.

Sounds like you just wanted to tell us how "caring" you are.

Logged
fencer
Guest
« Reply #18 on: October 14, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to "less desirable people"...You ..., posted by Seeker on Oct 14, 2004

A short response to why illegals are undesireable (this could also be applied to legals too).

Firstly, illegal (and legal) immigration hurts the US working poor by depressing their wages significantly and basically amounts to a tax increase on the poor. The tax is paid to unscrupulous business owners willing to hire illegals. BTW, even Cesar Chavez was against illegal migrant farm workers because he knew how they reduced his members wages and his unions leverage in obtaining decent pay and work conditions.

American taxpayers are being forced to pick up the tab for illegals education, medical care and a thousand other ways, paying what amounts to an added tax in the form of reduced and diminished social services, especially for the American poor. For example,  2 large hospitals have closed in LA dumping the burden of the remaining hospitals who themselves are on the verge of insolvency. So some business owners get the benefit of cheap labor but dump the healthcare burden on the City of (Insolvent) Angels.

Most illegals granted amnesty will never contribute a fraction in Soc. Sec taxes what they receive in benefits. Where is the gain for the US from this? Yeah, stoop workers work their butts off in the field but the fact is by the time they are 45 they are busted physically and pretty much a liability for the US. The farm owner has wrung his value off of them until they are so decrepit and not fit for anything except being a burden on the US – again, the benefits of illegals accrue to one small clique of private interests but the burdens are socialized to everyone else.


I like Spanish. I enjoy learning it. But why the hell should I have to be bilingual to get a job in the US [And in Miami bilingual  means being able to speak English] as is increasingly becoming the norm. Again this is another burden on the American working poor, who are in direct competition with illegals.

Illegal immigration is bringing the good offices of the US State in disrepute. If a business owner who wants to pay decent wages and benefits finds his competition breaking the law by hiring illegals, he then has 2 choices: break the law and hire illegals or go out of business. Putting law abiding people at odds with the law breeds contempt for the law.

Notwithstanding your brother’s worthy accomplishments the fact is that hispanic hispanic high school graduation rates are appalling in this country. Furthermore hispanic out of wedlock birth in the US is bordering on 50%. Few of these kids born to these broken homes are going to develop the norms appropriate to succeeding in a highly knowledge driven society, where the scant jobs remaining that haven’t already been offshored will demand a premium on education. And the menial jobs won’t be available because employers will always choose a recent illegal who still has his work ethic intact over a second generation with a hefty sense of entitlement to the American Dream.

Basically the US has imported a massive and still burgeoning underclass – this is and will  be a monumental disaster for the US.

How many maids, janitors and gardeners does a post-industrial society like ours need. Considering that decent manufacturing jobs are leaving the US and heading for Mexico and elsewhere. Mexico is getting our industrial jobs and we are getting Mexico’s unemployed. A very strange trade-off.

Mexico is a very rich country: it is a leading oil exporter, has massive mineral resources, has massive tourist industries. Why is it dumping its population on the US except to effect a reconquista?

Mexican illegal immigration is creating social pathologies in Mexico thereby hurting Mexico. Most illegals to the US are male; whatever the value of remittances back to Mexico illegal immigration is creating a lot of single female head of households in Mexico creating a generation of unfathered and delinquent children.

Remittances back to Mexico are not creating new productive investments in Mexico. The money gets spent in Walmarts thereby benefitting another rich US corporation (in cahoots with the corrupt, rich white oligarchy that rules Mexico). So another rich US interest benefits from illegal immigration, everyone else be damned. Basically, remittances are increasing the dependency of Mexico on the US as it would suffer a decline in living standards if the remittances stopped. This is a very unhealthy situation  for the US and Mexico and further binding the two nations together. The US should basically annex the whole of Mexico and at least get the minerals and oil since we are getting the people.

Mexico is not, contrary to your assessment, sending its best and brightest to the US it is sending the very dregs of its society. As Fred Reed writes in the “Nature of Mexican Immigration” ( http://www.fredoneverything.net/Mexicans.shtml ):

“The Mexicans who go north are the losers, the failures, the barely if at all literate, those with little to offer. They go because the Mexican economy is wretched, because the jobs that left the United States for Mexico are now leaving Mexico for China. Money. The United States can run a first-world economy. Mexico cannot. Why is debatable. The fact isn't.

While Mexicans are good people, their dregs often are not. On average the immigrants are uncultivated, uneducated, and of low intelligence. One may not mention the matter of intelligence, but it is well known among people who pay attention to such things, and has implications for the future. America is getting those Mexicans least worth getting, the least assimilable, and getting them in circumstances that do not encourage assimilation. Unlikely to prosper, they show signs of becoming another unsalvageable underclass.

Being Latins, they are not comfortable in an impersonal, technological northern European culture that values performance, competition, efficiency and punctuality. It isn’t their way. Often they plan to make money and return to Mexico; many then develop ties and remain. Yet even then they stay among their own. Their numbers as they swarm across the border are such that they can do it. If they don’t want to assimilate, don’t have to assimilate, and don’t have the wherewithal to assimilate—don’t expect assimilation.“ /////////////////////////////

I don’t get why these matters are beyond the pale of discussion as you imply by your outraged response.

And if I met an illegal Mexicana who loved me and I loved her I’d marry her in a heartbeat.

Logged
DallasSteve2
Guest
« Reply #19 on: October 14, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to Why must he be kidding?, posted by fencer on Oct 14, 2004

I agree with you on this one.  It burns me up when I hear President Bush say that these workers take jobs that Americans don't want (by Americans here I mean US citizens).  There is no such animal in the economic zoo.

If a job pays enough money it will attract workers.  It's basic supply and demand.  If most people don't want to wash dishes the restaurant owner will keep raising wages until some less-educated American says "OK, I'll wash your dishes."  So in fact he does want that job; if it pays enough.

What Bush should be saying is these are jobs that the American business owners don't want to pay enough money to attract Americans to do them.  So they make a fast buck by paying less wages to desperate illegals.

Now there is also some economic benefit because if they weren't here we would have to pay more for our Big Macs because wages would go up.  But does that and their small contribution in taxes offset the rising social costs that we all must pay?  I don't think so.

And the doors remain wide open.

Steve

Logged
Cali James
Guest
« Reply #20 on: October 14, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to Back to basic economics, posted by DallasSteve2 on Oct 14, 2004


I think you're right Steve.  There's definitely a gain to the consumer due to lower wages however I think it's more than being offset by the social costs due to the illegal aliens living here.  In the town I live in, here in Central California, many times the illegals have whole entire families.  The children attend school, when they are sick, they receive medical care, their offspring who are born here become citizens, we end up paying for these things.

I think there's a few things that could be done to bring the cost/benefits into balance.  Number one, a child of an illegal born in the U.S. should be an illegal also.  Public school should only be given to children who are legal residents here.  Public funds should not be used to provide health care to illegals.  If private organizations wish to fund this, that would be fine however Uncle should not be responsible for the good health of illegal aliens.

Logged
DallasSteve2
Guest
« Reply #21 on: October 14, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to Re: Back to basic economics, posted by Cali James on Oct 14, 2004

Agreed.

Mr. Heat sounds like he's in the late stages of syphilis.

Steve

Logged
Heat
Guest
« Reply #22 on: October 14, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to Back to basic economics, posted by DallasSteve2 on Oct 14, 2004

Once again you have shown you do not understand basic economics.
Logged
DallasSteve2
Guest
« Reply #23 on: October 14, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to LOL......., posted by Heat on Oct 14, 2004

My professor thought I did.  But you know economics better than he.  You are the Heatster.  The all powerful knower and seer, sharpest knife in the drawer, desired by all Latinas, and humble, too.

Steve

Logged
Heat
Guest
« Reply #24 on: October 14, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to Re: LOL......., posted by DallasSteve2 on Oct 14, 2004

Well your professor was a idot then. Have you not read about free markets?  Drugs, gambling, hookers ect....
I suggest that read some of Milton Freedman's books.

But then again you get your politics from movies by Mike Moore.  You're not a very deep thinker.

I would love to teach you however I'm busy enjoying the many women of Cali.

Eat your heart out.

Logged
DallasSteve2
Guest
« Reply #25 on: October 14, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to eat your heat out..., posted by Heat on Oct 14, 2004

If you're going to call someone an idiot, you really look a lot better if you spell it correctly.

Steve

Logged
Heat
Guest
« Reply #26 on: October 15, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to My professor was an idot?, posted by DallasSteve2 on Oct 14, 2004

I would like to answer you but I'm busy with the women here in Cali.  So like I said eat your heart out.
Logged
Cali James
Guest
« Reply #27 on: October 14, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to eat your heat out..., posted by Heat on Oct 14, 2004

[This message has been edited by Cali James]

Maybe you need to go back and read uncle milty again. He's on record as saying open immigration and the welfare state can NOT co-exist.  Many other conservative economists also point out that in present day America (as opposed to early 20th century), with the size and reach of big brother, we can not afford huge influxes of people at the bottom economic tiers of society.  They become a bigger drain on public funds than the offset they provide do to lower consumer costs.  I think Steve's closer to reality than you are on this one....
Logged
soltero
Guest
« Reply #28 on: October 14, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to Re: LOL......., posted by DallasSteve2 on Oct 14, 2004

Looking for instances where other immigrants have added to souring a relationship with a latina spouse or novia. Not trying to spark a debate on the socio-economic affects of the illegal population.
Logged
Hoda
Guest
« Reply #29 on: October 15, 2004, 04:00:00 AM »

... in response to HELLLLLLOOOOOOO, posted by soltero on Oct 14, 2004


back to to the top of this thread to remind folks.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!