test

[Patrick]

.

[Bueller]

... in response to test, posted by Patrick on Aug 26, 2001

Minor point, but "it's" above should be "its". I wouldn't care, but my eye gets drawn to it every time I log on.

[MaXX]

... in response to test, posted by Patrick on Aug 26, 2001

There are several links to porn sites in the latin section, popup hell after click them.

[NW Jim]

... in response to Several Links to porn sites, posted by MaXX on Aug 26, 2001

This one is listed under Other Agencies: Luv Zone. Probably not the type of Agency you want to list.

[Patrick]

... in response to Re: Several Links to porn sites............, posted by NW Jim on Aug 26, 2001

There's some dirt bag making money by creating foriegn introduction sites, getting them listed with several directories, then re-directing the traffic to porn sites on a pay per re-direct basis after they start getting traffic from their listing.

[Larry in Dallas]

... in response to Re: Re: Several Links to porn sites........, posted by Patrick on Aug 26, 2001

ALso, Patrick:

  Girls of sonora under the latin section is pornographic.  Can these people perputrating this fraud be prosecuted ( and hopefully persecuted too)?

                                  Larry in Dallas

[Michael B]

... in response to Re: Re: Re: Several Links to porn sites...., posted by Larry in Dallas on Aug 27, 2001

Yep, he's right, that one too. What's with these clowns? Do they think we can't find porn on the internet without their help (if we wanted to that is)?

A suggestion for Patrick--instead of just removing these links, why don't you start a list of "bad agencies". I don't mean that Joe Blow had a pricing disagrement with one of them or he didn't find his dream girl on a 2 day trip and thinks that's the agency's fault, but you could start a section that says "Warning! Planet-Love is aware that the following agencies deal in pornography and/or prostitution insead of legetimite introductions" or words to that affect, so that guys will know not to do business with them. You wouldn't have to list every porn site on the web, just the ones that attempt to disguise themselves as  legitimite matromonial introduction agencies.

OK, maybe you don't want to do that, your lawyers have told you they could sue your a** off. I'll understand if that's the case, but at least review them (once a week at least) and remove the links of the bad ones. I'm sure I speak for many of the guys here when I say that I work at a place that lets you use internet at work but they monitor you and have very strict policies about gambling, porn, "fantisy sport leagues", role playing games etc. on company equipment (even if after hours, on your own time). And a warning to you guys: most of you DO work in such a place, even if you don't realize it yet.  

Some of us would be in serious trouble at work if we clicked on "Meet Marriage Minded Ladies from Country XYZ" but the monitering software told the "security goons" that we went to "Naked Mexican Wh*res" or "Underage Asian Virgens Show it ALL".

[Patrick]

... in response to Help, Patrick--Re: Porno sites, posted by Michael B on Aug 27, 2001

I think there's at least one guy who simply sets up phoney agency sites to get them listed.  And I suspect it's one of the posters here (though in another forum).  I think I've learned to identify them before they get posted now.  Posting that it's a bad agency is meaningless since they are started without ever even having any agency behind them.

There was one agency (a former banner advertiser) who was removed from the list due to pornographic content at their site.  These other ones that are re-directing, in most cases, were never real agencies.  I believe some of them may be failed agencies who sell their traffic to porn sites after realizing that they're not going to be making much money with the the agency site.

[rubio]

... in response to test, posted by Patrick on Aug 26, 2001

test

[Bolo]

... in response to test, posted by Patrick on Aug 26, 2001

Please don't use the css styles to make the text size not able to be enlarged. Some of us (like me) have need to use the "largest" size font in IE to read with no strain to our eyes. Right now the forum page is locked because of the css styles in a small font that is not able to be resized in anyones browser.

Thanks.

[Patrick]

... in response to Re: test, posted by Bolo on Aug 26, 2001

I left fixed font sizes in the navigation links in the blue area, but changed it to allow clients to alter other areas.  Let me know if your able to view it better now.

[Bolo]

... in response to Style sheet changes made, posted by Patrick on Aug 26, 2001

Hi I refreshed my cache and it is large fonts on my page now. Thanks.

Bolo

[Bolo]

... in response to Style sheet changes made, posted by Patrick on Aug 26, 2001

The font resizing is still locked. To do a test just use your browser and choose the different font sizes in "view/text size".

THanks,
Bolo

[NW Jim]

... in response to test, posted by Patrick on Aug 26, 2001

Patrick,
Two problems noted so far with the new format:
(1) After I've read an item the title no longer turns to red; so can't tell for sure which items I've read.
(2) Switching between forums. Can't just hit the Back button on the browser to go back to the wwwboard frame. Have to use a button on the left--much easier to allow use of the back button.

Thanks
NW Jim  

[Patrick]

... in response to Re: test...user feedback, posted by NW Jim on Aug 26, 2001

The visited posts should now be appearing in a purple color.