Papi Reform

[papi]

If I were to expose a bad apple, all it is going to do is cause some momentary bad press/publicity and possibly a couple guys might not use their services.  But if the forums took a position and said to the Agencies you will be banned/deleted by harassing the posters privately and with legal – then the agencies will think twice before contacting the lawyers and making empty threats.  My position is that the forums should take a position. Suerte

[Michael B]

... in response to Papi Reform, posted by papi on Aug 9, 2005

is that when you dig your own grave it is not Patrick's nor Hoda's nor Dallas Steve's responsibility to prevent you from falling into it.

[Kiltboy1]

... in response to Papi Reform, posted by papi on Aug 9, 2005

Papi

I was at CSH when you were there and i do remember you complaining to steve about a few things, bed, TV , and i do recall that he went out and bought new ones to replace the ones you did not like. Maybe there were other things i do not know about , but i can tell anyone on this forum that Steve has always been above board with me and i recommend his agency with 100% confidence.

My friend Windy City had some issues with Steave and he made good on WC complaints, so i would say that he is trying as best he can to take care of his clients

Compared to most others in LA, his ranks at the top of the heap in all catagories .

KB

[papi]

... in response to Re: Papi Reform, posted by Kiltboy1 on Aug 10, 2005

i dont recall the TV, maybe the bed was not great and dont forget the rooster! i understand that he is in a new house. he threatened to sue me twice so it is a little hard to give him the same recommendation you have but maybe if things change in the future. Before he contacted me with legal, like i said -i sent several guys his way

[jim c]

... in response to Papi Reform, posted by papi on Aug 9, 2005

Stop being a drama queen!!! First libel and slander are hard to prove, damage must be proven, malicious intent (remember Absence of Malice). There is a saying, the defense against a slander suit is the truth. If what you said is the truth and or your opinion they can't beat you. Lawyers do not take these kinds of suits on retainer!!! this means the plaintif must pay the lawyer up front. If you were contacted by a legal firm, I am sure  it was a threat letter to disist and go away.  Have you ever heard of free speech and the right to an opinion.Where are they going to hold the trial?  on Avianca? Lastly do you really think the forum is going to retain a lawyer or an umbrella insurance policy. Why don't you stabilize yourself or go back on medication and buy my agency JIMC

[markxport]

... in response to Re: Papi Reform, posted by jim c on Aug 9, 2005

n/t